When my oldest son was about seven and already a movie enthusiast, we drove up to the Crandall Library in Glens Falls, N.Y. to watch Laurel and Hardy movies. I’d seen a notice in the paper. A film collector brought his own projector and a box of 16mm reels and set up in one of the meeting rooms. About a dozen people showed up, most very old or very young. For four hours we watched “County Hospital,” “Big Business,” “Double Whoopee,” “Our Wife,” “The Music Box,” “Way Out West” and other films with Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy. I’m certain I have never sustained laughter for that long. Of course, laughter has a social component, and I was merely joining my son and the rest of the all-male audience. This is one of my most cherished memories. Josh and I still love Laurel and Hardy.
It seems fitting that Arthur
Stanley Jefferson was born on Bloomsday, fourteen years before that joyous
event first took place on June 16, 1904. He entered the world in his grandparents’
house in Ulverston, Lancashire. Describing an early photo of the pair, Hugh
Kenner refers to their “stares of idiot hopefulness or fathomless exasperation
that constituted their public critique of the universe.” Kenner was reviewing The
Films of Laurel and Hardy by William K. Everson in the November 14, 1967, issue
of The National Review. Kenner, the scholar of Modernism, adept of Joyce,
Pound and Beckett, continues with the photograph:
“Bathed in the nearly horizontal light of early morning, the boys look fresh: the day is all before them. Creation has sprung forth anew, pianos once more unwrecked, cars undemolished, hats unbattered, suits unrumpled. Ollie lounges against a Ford that looks spry as a grasshopper, his bulk so poised as to seem weightless, feet nonchalantly crossed. Stan’s hands are clasped in ecstasy. They bend toward each other in communion. Soundless laughter convulses them; their closed eyes savor some invisible bit of business . . .”
Kenner carefully evaluates
the films, acknowledging that some were dross but others “classic,” flawless” and
even “perfect.” “Big Business” (1929) he calls their masterpiece. In it, the
boys are door-to-door Christmas tree salesmen. Kenner closes his review:
“Their comedy, more than
any other in cinema, theologized, so to speak, the common experience that if
you hammer nails you are apt to strike your thumb. The theology, being false,
is comic only in being belied: each film upheld it dogmatically; it was all
their films that belied it.”
In a November 7, 1967,
letter to Kenner, Guy Davenport praises the review and writes:
“A joy; your essay on Stan
and Ollie. Arthur Stanley Jefferson. And Oliver Norvell Hardy, of Milledgeville,
Ga. (where Flannery O’Connor wrote her novels), descendent of Nelson’s Hardy.
One would love to sic a genealogist onto the matter, and come up with a kinship
between Tom and Stan Jefferson.”
[The quoted letter can be
found in Questioning Minds: The Letters of Guy Davenport and Hugh Kenner
(ed. Edward M. Burns, Counterpoint, 2018).]
Critical opinion has it that Hardy (1892-1957) was the better actor of the two. In fairness to Laurel (1890-1965), his strengths were as a writer and director (he was the real director behind the credited director on many of their films). Hal Roach, Sr., the studio head, kept them on separate, staggered contracts so they couldn't confront him as a team for better money and/or working conditions. At his funeral in 1965, Laurel had prepared one last laugh: it was announced that he had warned, "If anyone cries at my funeral, I'll never speak to them again."
ReplyDeleteI forgot: one further thought. The late Terry Teachout once said that he just didn't "get" Laurel & Hardy. He was sure it was a character flaw on his part.
ReplyDeleteEvery year when I teach our science unit on simple machines, I show my 4th graders The Music Box and tell them to look for the six simple machines. (They're all there except the screw.) I feel like I'm doing God's work when I introduce them to Stan and Ollie.
ReplyDelete