Leopold Tyrmand leaves Poland and arrives for good in the United States in 1966. On his
first day in his adopted country, in New York City, he notes: “An ad of Eddie Condon playing in the neighborhood restaurant. All seems larger and better here
than in Europe with the exception of frankfurters, which are not as good as in
Frankfurt.” In brief, that’s Tyrmand—impish, jazz-loving, happy by nature,
relieved to have breached the Iron Curtain and left its dreariness and brutality
behind. The book is Notebooks of a
Dilettante (MacMillan, 1970), much of which originally appeared in The New Yorker. In the section titled “American
Diary,” he recounts a visit to New Orleans (about which he wrote a book in
Poland but has never visited): “Jazz—in Europe a symbol of passion or of joy,
of spiritual freedom or of cultural independence—is here like oxygen.” Next,
Tyrmand is on to Houston, where he has lunch in the Hotel Rice with the Houston
Rotary Club:
“.
. . the Star-Spangled Banner streams proudly—encouraged with unsophisticated efficiency
by a silent fan—the audience sings the anthem. At once I have the impression of
facing an enormous, organized strength. An almost military power emanates from
these middle-class, suburban, downtown-minded executives, associates, managers,
and assistant directors—a conscious, disciplined, social might, constructed
differently from that in totalitarian regimes but probably the only kind that
could successfully and forcefully resist any encroachment from right or left.”
Tyrmand
visits the University of Houston, the Manned Spacecraft Center in Seabrook (now
the Johnson Space Center) and the Alley Theatre (he sees Pirandello’s Right You Are if You Think You Are). He
notes that the aerospace scientists wanted to talk to him about “film, theatre,
the latest books of Bellow and Capote, and were better oriented vis-à-vis
Cardinal Wyszyński’s affair than an average newspaperman in France.” Tyrmand
writes:
“In
Houston the past tense is out of use. The present tense is avoided, and
everyone speaks only in the future tense. For example: `This steak is
delicious,’ I try to flatter my host. `You’ll have to come next year,’ he assures
me. `You’ll see what steaks we have in Texas. . .’
"In
the Astrodome, the biggest covered living room in the world, the guide repeats:
`In our space age. . .’ One must admit that it applies here, much more than in
Warsaw, Paris, or Boston.”
How
refreshingly different are Tyrmand’s impressions from Simone de Beauvoir’s in America Day by Day (1954), an account of
the four months she spent touring the U.S. in 1947. Imagine her at a Rotary
Club meeting, a wet blanket ranting about capitalism and the bourgeoisie. On the day she
arrives in Houston, de Beauvoir deploys the pre-packaged, Faulknerized
perceptions she had long before setting foot in Texas: “This is the land of
wealth and misery, a luxuriant and cruel human land. Here and there, amid
fecund solitude [?], stands a hut or a group of dilapidated huts; on the threshold,
sometimes black faces, sometimes white ones—the poor whites of the south whose
wretched lives are described by Steinbeck and Caldwell.” I don’t recall Steinbeck
setting any of his fiction in the South, and Caldwell’s novels are comic books.
Her taste in literature is almost as dubious as her taste in boyfriends. The
parade of platitudes continues:
“In
the absence of cockfights, a professor takes me to a wrestling match after my
lecture; this may not be especially Texan, but at least it’s typically
American. We arrive toward the end of the match in a huge sports arena filled
with a delirious crowd. The women shout `Kill him! Kill him!’ in raucous
voices. In the ring the wrestlers confront each other with looks of bestial
hatred, studiously imitating the stance and snarl of King Kong.”
Before
she leaves the city, de Beauvoir really gets insulting: “For the tourist,
Houston at night is as gloomy as Buffalo.” De Beauvoir can’t help her snobbery
even when talking about things she knows nothing about. Tyrmand understands snobbery: “Europeans
prefer Hitchcock to Godard, a good western to boring cinéma d’œil, and Tennessee Williams to Duerrenmatt. Only American
snobs maintain that Robbe-Grillet is more interesting than Philip Roth, that
Moravia knows life better than Saul Bellow, and that John Ford is childish but
Alain Resnais mature.”
No comments:
Post a Comment