“I
did not take hold of my studies with avidity, in fact I rarely ever read over a
lesson the second time during my entire cadetship. I could not sit in my room
doing nothing.”
I’m
appalled by the good students, the ones with purpose and focus, who arrive on
campus knowing what they want and how to get it. They seem blessed with a freakish
maturity. I was lost, and like any devoted lay-about, I resolved to get even
more lost. In high school I had coasted and earned good grades without effort
or application. That regimen didn’t work for long at the university. My refuge
was the library. Instead of studying or even going to class, I went there daily,
trolled the shelves, found what I didn’t know I wanted, and carried it back to my
carrel. That’s where I first read Tristram
Shandy, At Swim-Two Birds, Auto-da-Fé, and bound volumes of an
English film journal, the name of which I no longer remember. This curriculum
sustained me for three years, and then I dropped out, and didn’t return to earn
my degree for another thirty years.
The
author of the passage quoted at the top is Ulysses S. Grant, describing his
time at West Point in Chapter II of Personal Memoirs (1885). That’s another volume I first read in my carrel. Except for
Lincoln, no president has written better prose. Grant attend the U.S. Military
Academy starting in 1839, and graduated in 1843 (twenty-first in a class of
thirty-nine). Besides sharing Ohio as our birthplace, Grant and I took a
similar approach to study:
“There
is a fine library connected with the Academy from which cadets can get books to
read in their quarters. I devoted more time to these, than to books relating to
the course of studies. Much of the time, I am sorry to say, was devoted to
novels, but not those of a trashy sort. I read all of Bulwer’s then published,
Cooper’s, Marryat’s, Scott’s, Washington Irving’s works, Lever’s, and many
others that I do not now remember.”
The
unfamiliar name on Grant’s reading list is Charles Lever (1806-1872), an Irish novelist
and occasional con man who was touted by Trollope. In short, Grant’s tastes in
fiction favored the popular and romantic, what later critics might have
dismissed, at best, as middlebrow but "not those of a trashy sort." About the rest of his studies, Grant
writes:
“Mathematics
was very easy to me, so that when January came, I passed the examination,
taking a good standing in that branch. In French, the only other study at that
time in the first year’s course, my standing was very low. In fact, if the
class had been turned the other end foremost I should have been near head. I
never succeeded in getting squarely at either end of my class, in any one
study, during the four years. I came near it in French, artillery, infantry and
cavalry tactics, and conduct.”
No comments:
Post a Comment