“I have
written because it gave me pleasure, because it came natural to me, because it
was like talking or breathing, besides the big fact that it was necessary to
work for my children. That, however, was not the first motive, so that when I
laugh inquiries off and say that it is my trade, I do it only by way of eluding
the question which I have neither time nor wish to enter into.”
As I say, I’ve
never before read Mrs. Oliphant’s work but based on those two sentences, I judge
her an interesting, clear-sighted, no-nonsense writer, probably not given to
romanticizing the trade. I like her mix of pleasure (usually underrated or
ignored by professionals) and practicality. She is matter-of-fact about her
gifts:
“When people
comment upon the number of books I have written, and I say that I am so far
from being proud of that fact that I should like at least half of them
forgotten, they stare—and yet it is quite true; and even here I could no more
go solemnly into them, and tell why I had done this or that, than I could fly.
They are my work, which I like in the doing, which is my natural way of
occupying myself, though they are never so good as I meant them to be.”
Such
writerly honesty is refreshing. Contrast Mrs. Oliphant’s admissions with those oh-so-precious
author interviews in which humility drips narcissism. Auden might have been
writing about Mrs. Oliphant in the “Sext” section of “Horae Canonicae” (The Shield
of Achilles, 1955):
“You need
not see what someone is doing
to know if
it is his vocation,
“you have
only to watch his eyes:
a cook
mixing a sauce, a surgeon
“making a
primary incision,
a clerk
completing a bill of lading,
“wear the
same rapt expression,
forgetting
themselves in a function.
“How beautiful it is,
that
eye-on-the-object look.”
Penelope Fitzgerald thought highly of Mrs Oliphant. There's an excellent essay on her in PF's A House of Air: Selected Writings.
ReplyDeleteLike many women of her era, she was an excellent writer of ghost stories.
ReplyDelete