Ivy Compton-Burnett
(1884-1969) is a novelist easy to overestimate and easier to dismiss, and I try
to navigate a sensible middle course. She has already spawned a “cult,” one
much taken with the purported campiness of her twenty novels. Cultists too
often liken her to Ronald Firbank, whose campy novels I find un-rereadable. That’s
not how I read Compton-Burnett. She’s a moralist with low regard for human
beings. Where other see dysfunction, especially in families, she sees petty wickedness
and cruelty. She makes no excuses for her little monsters, and a reader either laughs
and admires the adroitness of her dialogue-heavy novels, or gives up in boredom
and disgust. She is not for readers seeking uplift.
A reader,
knowing my enjoyment of Compton-Burnett’s work, has sent a passage from Diaries, 1942-1954 (2006) by James Lees-Milne (1908-97), the English architectural historian best known for his
gossipy diary. The first person mentioned in the passage above is Margaret
Jourdain (1876-1951), who wrote on English furniture and interior decoration,
and was Compton-Burnett’s longtime companion. Lees-Milne continues:
“Margaret
Jourdain is patently jealous of Ivy Compton-Burnett, whom she keeps
unapproachable except through herself. The two have lived together for years
and are never parted. They are an Edwardian and remarkably acidulated pair. The
coiffures of both look like wigs.”
Thus far,
you would expect Lees-Milne to remain catty. He surprises us:
“Miss C.-B.,
whom I consider to be the greatest living English novelist, is upright, starchy
and forthright. There is a bubbling undercurrent of humour in every observation
that she makes, and she makes a good many, apparently hackneyed and usually
sharp, in a rapid, choppy, rather old-fashioned upper-middle-class manner,
clipping her breathless words. She enunciates clearly and faultlessly, saying
slightly shocking things in a matter-of-fact tone, following up her sentences
with a lot of ‘dontcherknows,’ and then smiling perceptibly. She has a low,
breasty chuckle. She has not unpleasing, sharp features, and her profile is
almost beautiful. But she is not the kind of woman who cares tuppence for
appearances, and wears a simple, unremarkable black dress which she smoothes
down with long fingers.”
I knew of Lees-Milne
but have never read his diaries or the rest of his prolific body of work, but
based on this passage I may try the diary. “Upright, starchy and forthright” is
good and “a low, breasty chuckle” is even better. A quick online search
revealed another observation of Compton-Burnett by Lees-Milne, this one from
Ancestral Voices, 1942-3 (1975), the first published volume of his diary:
“Ivy
Compton-Burnett ate half a pot of raspberry jam, and I was shocked to see her
surreptitiously wipe her sticky fingers upon the cover of my sofa. Both she and
Margaret ate like horses. This time Miss C.-B. talks a great deal
more than Margaret. Her description of the Poetry Reading and Lady Gerald
Wellesley's [drunken] antics was very funny. They are a wicked pair.”
See also https://nigeness.blogspot.com/2015/12/ivy-and-margaret-fall-out-over-cydrax.html
ReplyDeleteI just found out that when Knopf published the first American edition of one of her works it was re-titled “Bullivant and the Lambs,” apparently because the original title, “Manservant and Maidservant,” sounded too much like Edwardian porn. That was in 1947, hardly the time of decorum which Knopf’s nicety (if that’s what it was) suggests.
ReplyDeleteI’ve never read her, partly because an electrical charge in my brain used to substitute “Edith Sitwell” for her name whenever she was mentioned, and after that I tuned out completely. But now that I’ve got them disambiguated, I’ll try C.-B. – or try to try her . . .