During the
second year of the Peloponnesian War, in 430 B.C., an epidemic invaded Athens.
Thucydides writes not only as a witness, the historian of his time and place,
but as a sufferer. He contracted the disease and survived, though as many as 100,000
of his fellow Athenians did not. It killed Pericles and his family. The exact
nature of the illness is still debated, though modern scholars favor typhus or
typhoid. The war continued for another twenty-six years after the outbreak,
which probably contributed to the eventual defeat of Athens, and changed subsequent
European and world history. I remembered Thucydides while reading Zbigniew Herbert’s
“Why the Classics”:
“in the
fourth book of the Peloponnesian War
Thucydides
tells among other things
the story of
his unsuccessful expedition
“among long
speeches of chiefs
battles
sieges plague
dense net of
intrigues of diplomatic endeavours
the episode
is like a pin
in a forest”
Among
twentieth-century poets, only Cavafy, Hill and Montale rival Herbert in the deft integration
of historical events into their work. In 424 B.C., Thucydides commanded seven
Athenian ships but arrived too late to save his native city, Amphipolis, from
the Spartan general Brasidas. For this, Herbert writes, Thucydides “paid his
native city / with lifelong exile.” The Greek included a description of his
failure to relieve Amphipolis in his history. The Polish veteran of Nazi and
Communist repression adds: “exiles of all times / know what price that is.” Herbert
writes in the poem’s concluding lines:
“if art for
its subject
will have a
broken jar
a small
broken soul
with a great
self-pity
“what will
remain after us
will it be lovers' weeping
in a small dirty hotel
when wall-paper dawns”
For Herbert,
all history is contemporary history. The walls between eras are permeable. In a 1994 interview he writes: “I am afraid we may sink totally into idiocy. Maybe
it already is too late, but I think we need to start a process of national
education and get rid of our complexes. . . Our major enemies are now our
national shortcomings: hypocrisy, self-love, megalomania.”
Herbert is speaking
of Poland in the immediate post-Soviet era but his observations suggest a broader
relevance. I read Herbert when I want an astringent cleansing of the shallower
regions of my thinking. He goes on to say in the interview:
“I have not
encountered absolute evil except in men.”
“Practice
shows that sooner or later, the dark spots on history's map show up from under
the gilded surface. Western countries, from France to USA, are examples. One
has to fight the dark tendencies of one's past, like Germany did after World
War II.”
“Nations
seldom receive from History political leaders who also possess moral authority.”
It is interesting to note how many great historians suffered exile of a sort. Polybius, Gibbon, and Ronald Syme, all spent significant time away from their homeland. Plutarch (On Exile 14) lists several others. And I think of all the academic historians from Germany who came to America in flight from the Nazis. In fact, I remember one of my teachers saying that Syme thought exile nearly essential to the making of a historian.
ReplyDelete