When I was a teenager with a subscription to The New Yorker, the magazine’s premiere critic, the one whose byline I looked for first, was not Pauline Kael, the movie reviewer who wrote like a teenager, but Whitney Balliett, the jazz writer who treated musicians and his readers like grownups. Years later, when I was writing about jazz for a newspaper, Balliett’s profiles and reviews were my field guides in matters musical and stylistic. I virtually plagiarized his manner. Once, while wring about a performance by Nick Brignola, I off-handedly referred to his baritone saxophone as “plumbing.” A reader sent me a note to say I sounded like Balliett, and I took it as a compliment. It’s satisfying to see that Ted Gioia, in “The True Poet of Jazz,” shares my long-standing esteem for Balliett:
“He retained the
enthusiasm of a fan, but it was married to the expressive virtuosity of a
master writer who could extract from his typewriter something akin to what
others drew from their saxophones and trumpets. It was almost as if he were a
jazz musician himself, but one who wrote essays for The New Yorker
instead of soloing over ‘I Got Rhythm’ chords.”
“Expressive virtuosity” –
that’s what true writers spend a lifetime trying to achieve. Like his elder at The
New Yorker, A.J. Liebling, Balliett is a primer in prose, even
for writers with little or no interest in jazz. What he writes is not “pretty.”
It is always carefully weighed and measured. Kael, whose prose is forgettable,
has been sanctified with a volume of her own by the Library of America. Why not
Balliett? A writer can learn from him that everything – home décor, modes of
speech, food and drink preferences, the weather, the hardness of a reed, table manners, ambient sounds -- carry potential significance, revelations of character. All contribute
to the writer’s subject at hand. When I interviewed musicians Balliett had
written about – Elvin Jones, Marian McPartland, Dave McKenna, among others – I always
asked what they thought of Balliett’s work in general and the profiles he had written of them in
particular. All smiled and remembered him with respect and admiration.
About a 1974 performance
by pianist Bill Evans, Balliett writes: “Henry James would have relished such
intricate footwork.” His report on the 1970 Newport Jazz Festival begins like
this: “Newport, as Henry James discovered, can make a philosopher of anyone.” Here’s
Balliett in a 1961 piece about the great alto player Johnny Hodges:
“Hodges’ bent toward sweetness
did not emerge until the mid-thirties, when he began recording, with Ellington,
a series of slow ballad solos. On such occasions, which he still indulges in,
Hodges employs a tone that seems to be draped over the notes like a lap robe.
Hodges does little improvising in these ballads. Instead, he issues languorous
statements of the melody and long glissandi topped by an almost unctuous
vibrato. Hodges’ Edgar Guest strain is generally well concealed, though, and it
is nowhere in sight when he plays the blues, which have long provided his basic
materials.”
When reviewing an
anthology of jazz short stories, Balliett noted the sentimentality that plagues
most fiction and film devoted to the music. Eudora Welty’s “Powerhouse,” he wrote,
“may be the best fiction ever written about jazz.” Forgivingly, Balliett says
fiction writers and poets work at a disadvantage because, “The music is
ephemeral. A novelist can describe the `Appassionata’ and tell you exactly how
his pianist hero plays it, but a jazz novelist must describe a music that is
gone the instant it is played.” The problem is not the ephemerality of the
music – that’s merely its challenge -- but the ephemerality of the writers who write
about it.
Most of the essential
Balliett can be found in American Singers: Twenty-seven Portraits in Song
(1988), American Musicians II: Seventy-one Portraits in Jazz (1996), Collected
Works: A Journal of Jazz 1954–2001 (2001) and New York Voices: Fourteen
Portraits (2006). As Gioia writes, “Above all, Balliett’s writing has held
up—more than 500 essays on jazz, and enough books to fill up a shelf labeled
with Dewey Decimal number 781.65.”
It was a book review by Whitney Balliett that moved me to read The Book of Ebenezer le Page, a supreme novel, near forty years ago, and revisit it several times since, always with pleasure, and always with gratitude to Balliett. He quoted the opening sentences, and called it a "vernacular novel," his own term, I think. There wasn't a thread or hair of condescension in his love for vernacular prose; I marches with him.
ReplyDeletePauline Kael? Perhaps what we need is fewer and better Library of America honorees. And larger type.
ReplyDelete