Were it possible to distill our last century into nineteen lines of blank verse and close it with a bitter, O. Henry-like denouement, it might be Anthony Hecht’s “The Ceremony of Innocence” (The Darkness and the Light, 2001):
“He was taken from his
cell, stripped, blindfolded,
And marched to a noisy
room that smelled of sweat.
Someone stamped on his
toes; his scream was stopped
By a lemon violently
pushed between his teeth
And sealed with friction
tape behind his head.
His arms were tied, the
blindfold was removed
So he could see his
tormentors, and they could see
The so-much-longed-for
terror in his eyes.
And one of them said, ‘The
best part of it all
Is that you won't even be
able to pray.’
When they were done with
him, two hours later,
They learned that they had
murdered the wrong man
And this made one of them
thoughtful. Some years after,
He quietly severed
connections with the others
Moved to a different city,
took holy orders,
And devoted himself to
serving God and the poor,
While the intended victim
continued to live
On a walled estate,
sentried around the clock
By a youthful, cell
phone-linked praetorian guard.”
Sound familiar? Readers of
Koestler know the scene depicted in the opening lines, as do those familiar
with the fates of Babel, Mandelstam and Bonhoeffer, among millions of others.
Hecht gives his poem a title borrowed from Yeats. “The blood-dimmed tide is
loosed,” he suggests, as it was in 1919. Readers have complained that the poem’s
ending seems tacked on, an after-thought of cheap irony. But isn’t human
destiny capricious? Doesn’t it often strain credulity? Don’t bad people
sometimes repent? Don’t the wrong people die every day?
If Cinna the Poet was good enough for Shakespeare, he's good enough for me.
ReplyDelete