When we confidently say that “people don’t change,” we are wrong. Most people on most occasions don’t change in fundamental ways. Inertia and rationalization are powerful, seldom recognized forces in history and our personal histories.
Some
extraordinary men and women have made dramatic changes in their lives, often
moral or spiritual, but so have utterly ordinary people. By conventional
standards, Whittaker Chambers (1901-1961) appeared to be a caricature of
ordinariness – fat, frowning, indifferently dressed, the opposite of his legal
and philosophical opponent, the smooth and shiny Alger Hiss. Numerous acquaintances
described Chambers’ appearance and manner as “Dostoevskian.” Yet he went from
being a Communist and a spy for the Soviet Union to being an American patriot,
a courageous witness against Hiss, a prophet and first-rate writer, while Hiss
remained a lifelong liar. Chambers begins his memoir, Witness (1952), with a twenty-one-page “Foreword in the Form of a
Letter to My Children”:
“Then, on
August 3, 1948, you learned for the first time that your father had once been a
Communist, that he had worked in something called ‘the underground,’ that it
was shameful, and that for some reason he was in Washington telling the world
about it. While he was in the underground, he testified, he had worked with a
number of other Communists. One of them was a man with the odd name of Alger
Hiss. Later, Alger Hiss denied the allegation. Thus the Great Case began, and
with it our lives were changed forever.”
On that
date, Chambers appeared under subpoena before the U.S. House Un-American
Activities Committee and testified about his work in the nineteen-thirties in
the Soviet spy network. He served as a courier between his Soviet handlers and a
network of federal officials, including Hiss, who worked in the State
Department. In December 1948, Hiss was indicted on two counts of perjury. Statutes
of limitations for espionage had expired. His first trial ended in a hung jury.
In a second trial, Hiss was convicted in January 1950 and sentenced to five
years in prison on each of both counts, to run concurrently. He served three
years and eight months in Lewisburg Federal Prison.
Chambers, as
he expected, was pilloried by the Left, and no doubt some still proclaim his
treachery and Hiss’ innocence. Chambers, who became a Quaker, always insisted his witness was
about more than an espionage case. He intended the title of his memoir to be
understood in both the legal and religious senses. In the forward addressed to
his son and daughter, Chambers writes:
“Communism
is what happens when, in the name of Mind, men free themselves from God. But
its view of God, its knowledge of God, its experience of God, is what alone
gives character to a society or a nation, and meaning to its destiny. Its
culture, the voice of this character, is merely that view, knowledge,
experience, of God, fixed by its most intense spirits in terms intelligible to
the mass of men. There has never been a society or a nation without God. But
history is cluttered with the wreckage of nations that became indifferent to
God, and died.”
While still
a writer and editor for Time magazine,
Chambers reviewed Rebecca West’s The
Meaning of Treason in the December 8, 1947 issue (collected in Ghosts on the Roof: Selected Journalism of
Whittaker Chambers 1931-1959; ed. Terry Teachout, Regnery Gateway, 1989). Here
is the conclusion of the review, “Circles of Perdition,” featured on the cover:
“For all her
warmth of heart and incandescence of mind, she is seldom averse to a good
brawl. She listens, calmly poised for pouncing, when she is called a Fascist, a
Communist, an anti-Semite, though she is none of those things. The root of the
misunderstanding is that in a world racked by partisan passion, which more
& more insists on viewing men in black & white, as caricatures of good
or evil, she finds them blends of both. Her view asserts the faith that what distinguishes
men, not so much from the brutes as from their more habitual selves, is the
fact that however tirelessly they pursue evil, their inveterate aspiration,
invariable even in depravity, is never for anything else but for the good.
“This faith
Rebecca West tries to express with a tonality equal to its meaning. Thus, in a
prosy age, her style strives continually toward a condition of poetry, and
comes to rest in a rhetoric that, at its best, is one of the most personal and
eloquent idioms of our time.”
In turn,
West published a not wholly approving review of Witness in the June 1952 issue of The Atlantic (collected in Alger
Hiss, Whittaker Chambers, and the Schism in the American Soul; ed. Patrick
Swan, ISI Books, 2003). She concludes her review:
“Perhaps the
best way of understanding Whittaker Chambers would be to turn back to the
records of the Dreyfus case, and try to imagine what it would have been like
had the witness who exposed the Army conspiracy been not the straightforward
soldier, Colonel Picquart, but Charles Péguy, the Christian poet and
philosopher who was Dreyfus’s greatest literary defender, and whose
relationship with the Roman Catholic Church showed the same inconsistency as Whittaker
Chambers’s relationship to the Society of Friends. The spectators would often
have been greatly perplexed.”
Witness is arguably the finest memoir written by an
American. It’s only rival, Speak, Memory,
was the work of another writer with painful, first-hand experience of Communism
– Vladimir Nabokov. Along with Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man, Witness
makes 1952 an annus mirabilis in
American literature.
"Witness" is a good and important book, but I think U. S. Grant's "Personal Memoirs" (1885) is still the finest memoir by an American, certainly the best military memoir.
ReplyDeleteChambers wrote the best piece on the risible Ayn Rand that I've ever read, an incisive and good humored job that thoroughly demolished its target and her pretensions.
ReplyDelete