The most important service some of us can perform, especially for young readers, is simply mentioning the names of books and writers we revere and then attesting to their worth. More readers have credited me with introducing them to the novels of William Maxwell than any other. A.J. Liebling probably comes in second and Guy Davenport a distant third.
Most schools today are profoundly
provincial places, unlikely to expose students even to well-known writers who
have thus far earned the literary equivalent of nihil
obstat. Nor do most teachers and parents read ambitiously. Public libraries have been deeply
culling their collections, reducing the chances of discovery among the shelves.
Such serendipity is the soul of a library, and how when young I happened on
writers as various as Franz Kafka and John Updike.
In 1978, David Levin published “Yvor Winters at Stanford” in the Virginia Quarterly Review. Levin joined the English department in 1952, when Winters reigned as the intimidating éminence grise, and taught there for nineteen years. Levin arrived while finishing his doctoral thesis devoted to four American historians -- Bancroft, Prescott, Motley, and Parkman. At their first meeting, during a reception for new faculty members, Winters asked him, “Which one was the best?” Levin describes the ensuing conversation:
“I had
thought very little about ranking them. They were all interesting, all
valuable; what did I care about comparative judgments? I finally brought out my
answer, the standard opinion: ‘I suppose Parkman was the best historian.’
“‘Parkman’s
the worst,’ Winters replied, biting down on his pipe; ‘Motley’s the best.’ His
eyes told me that he took some comic pleasure in expressing that unconventional
judgment, but I knew, too, that he meant it.”
As a young instructor, Levin was shaken but not deterred from getting to know Winters, learning to gauge his literary judgments and ultimately respect him:
“Years later
I saw in this first literary conversation an epitome of the most exemplary
service that Winters' criticism and his personal conduct performed for me and many
others. He not only provoked me to think seriously about value but repeatedly
showed me the value in writers I had neglected or underestimated.”
Some bluntly broadcast evaluations are nothing but hot air and testosterone. Academia in my experience overflows with such behavior, most of it sheer flatulence. Levin says of Winters: “In the 15 years of our association [Winters died in January 1968], I never heard him praise a literary work in which I failed to find genuine excellence.”
Included in Poems in Memory of Yvor Winters on the
Centenary of his Birth (edited and published by R.L. Barth, 2000), is a
sonnet written by Levin, “To a Moral Navigator, Observed on His Way to Class,” written
“For Yvor Winters”:
“Solemn as
Queequeg, porting an old harpoon,
You march in
sunshine, stepping forth to teach
Young
navigators how to haul, to reach
The mystery
of Melville, whale, typhoon.
You have not
flung your quadrant at the moon,
Or thrown
away your pipe, or scorned the beach,
Or, with
some captains of demonic speech,
Followed
dumb feeling to a blind lagoon.
“Yet reason
must be brought to your defense.
You reach a
faith too brave for dogmatists.
Unable to
receive the Holy Ghost,
And knowing
what your unbelief has cost,
You use dead
reckoning, and meet white mists
In the pure
style of grave intelligence.”
Levin likens
Winters to Queequeg, the master harpooner, not mad Ahab. In “The Quadrant,”
Chapter 118 of Moby-Dick, Ahab curses
the navigational instrument and smashes it on the deck, vowing to navigate the
Pequod with “the level ship's compass, and the level dead reckoning, by log and
by line” -- typical self-destructive bravado. Instead, Winters shares with
Queequeg “the pure style of grave intelligence.” And yes, Winters did bring a harpoon to class when teaching Moby-Dick.
[To Baceseras: Some writers have been banished from the curriculum. Others, for now, have been granted dispensation, which can be abruptly revoked.]
I know what nihil obstat means, but not what you mean by it in paragraph two. Could you clarify, please.
ReplyDeleteAnyhow, what I really wanted to say, it sounds as though Winters at Stanford was a Full Eminence, not just a grey one.
Whether Parkman was the worst historian of the four (whatever that might mean) I don't know, but he was a brilliant writer and I have hugely enjoyed working my way through the Library of America editions of his France and England in North America. It's a breathtaking epic that was relegated to a few dull pages on the "French and Indian War" in the textbooks that were inflicted on me when I was in school.
ReplyDeleteAs is so often he case, I was led to Parkman by another writer, the Irish novelist Brian Moore, who spoke highly of Parkman in the preface to his novel about the Jesuit missions to the Native American tribes, Black Robe.