Dr. Merrill Moore (1903-57) is remembered as a psychiatrist and sonneteer with a bad case of poetic elephantiasis. Not that his poems were big. They seldom exceeded fourteen lines but there were a lot of them – one estimate suggests 50,000 -- and a remarkable number actually saw print. He was the sort of poet who could – and often did -- write a sonnet in the car while waiting for the traffic light to change. In 1938 he published M: One Thousand Autobiographical Sonnets (Harcourt, Brace). It tips the scales at almost three pounds.
Moore was
born in Tennessee. At Vanderbilt he was a member of the Fugitives, that group
of Southern poets including John Crowe Ransom and Allen Tate. He went on to
teach neurology at Harvard Medical School. Even a layman is tempted to diagnose
Dr. Moore’s sonneteering as pathological in origin. One senses he needed to get them out
of his system. I’ve probably read several hundred of his sonnets over the years
and remember nothing about them, no flash of insight or memorable phrase. I’m
fairly certain I’ve never reread a single one. Of course, Moore’s definition of
the sonnet is elastic. In his “Admission Note” to Case Record from a Sonnetorium (Twayne, 1951) he writes:
“These are
samples of the new and varying forms the sonnet can take when it is freed from the
ancient prescription that it must
have an octet and a sestet to be ‘regular’ (Petrarchan or Italian), and,
likewise, that it is ‘irregular’ if it has three quatrains and a couplet (Shakespearean,
or English, form). In other words: Give the sonnet a little liberty, and see
what happens.”
What happens
is a whole lot of chopped-up prose with little direction, focus or punch. Why bother
calling these things “sonnets”? In 1930, when Yvor Winters reviewed Moore’s The Noise That Time Makes in Poetry, which comes with a foreword by Ransom, he
diagnosed the doctor’s problem:
“Mr. Ransom,
in his introduction to Mr. Moore’s poems, has said that Mr. Moore has always found
it easier to write a new poem than to revise an old one; this is, I imagine,
true of all of us. Mr. Moore’s poems are obviously unrevised; the meters are a
kind of rhymed and butchered prose, and the diction is for the most part very,
very approximate, to speak as charitably as possible.”
Winters’
assessment might be rubber-stamped on the works of a thousand poets. Revision
is the essence of all writing, not just poetry. Few of us get it right the
first time. I did find Case Record from a
Sonnetorium amusing, though not for his contributions. The book is modeled
as a series of medical case histories. Thus, the previously mentioned “Admission Note,”
followed by a “Prognosis” by Louis Untermeyer and a series of epigraphs titled “Overheard
in the Waiting Room.” The book closes with a “Consultant’s Opinion” by Ransom,
a “Laboratory Note” by “Henry H. Wells, Ph.D.” and a “Discharge Note” by
William Carlos Williams, M.D. Here’s a sample of a Moore sonnet, “Elizabeth
Fox, Single, Age 54”:
“Lives alone
(alone) on the fifth floor
To which she
climbs by power of her legs
After her
work at the Five-and-Ten Cent Store
Where she
covers counters with green baize
After the
sales and customers are over.
“Elizabeth
has arthritis and her spine
Aches at
least eight hours out of nine.
“Elizabeth
Fox was once young; she is old
Now, her
feet and hands are always cold.
“The
mattress she sleeps on is hard and dirty;
It was clean
and soft when she was thirty.
“For supper
she eats crackers, some preserves,
A piece of
bacon and some thin weak tea.
“Elizabeth,
it is not entirely your own fault.”
This is
pretty lame stuff, a little embarrassing, though the idea of a physician writing a
book of poems based on patients, real or imagined, is promising. The quoted
sonnet is typical of Moore’s poems, no worse than most. Now for the good news:
the book is wonderfully illustrated by Edward Gorey (1925-2000). Each of the
two dozen poems is accompanied by one of his cartoons. The copy I borrowed from
the Fondren Library was signed by Moore for Alice Dixon Bond, the literary
editor of The Boston Herald from 1940
to 1964:
That was seriously bad. I hope he was a better physician than he was a "poet." That "sonnet" almost makes Edgar A. Guest look like a literary genius.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like a book worth having for twenty-four Gorey drawings, and of that vintage. I'd like to know what he thought of the poems he was illustrating, if that one is a fair sample. Gorey knew how to appreciate the exquisite forms badness can take. I owe him thanks for making me aware of Irene Iddlesleigh, the Worst Novel Ever Written. Until you read it, you don't really know what it means to gape at a page.
ReplyDeleteTo get a gander of a better job of sonnets, you may want to look at THE GOLDEN GATE by Vikram Seth [1986]. Based on your very catholic approach to poetry, I'd be nonplussed, at the very least, to learn that you haven't read it, but I wanted to add my two cents. To me, the most impressive thing about this novel written in sonnets is that you can watch Seth's command of the form solidifies as he goes, so that the first sonnet--already very good--seems positively crude compared with the last.
ReplyDeleteMM was a curious fellow, and that's a pretty understated but effective skewering of his obsessive sonneteering... Would like to see the Gorey illustrations...
ReplyDelete