On June, 25, 1763, Boswell and Dr. Johnson dined at the Mitre Tavern on Fleet Street. The friends had met for the first time just a month earlier at Thomas Davies’ bookshop on Russell Street. Johnson starts the conversation with a dismissal of Thomas Gray (1716-71). In the Life, Boswell reports Johnson saying:
“‘Sir, I do
not think Gray a first-rate poet. He has not a bold imagination, nor much
command of words. The obscurity in which he has involved himself will not
persuade us that he is sublime. His Elegy in a Church-yard has a happy
selection of images, but I don't like what are called his great things.’”
Almost
twenty years later in his “Life of Gray,” Johnson again expresses
disappointment in most of Gray’s poetry, making a partial exception of the “Elegy”:
“In the
character of his Elegy I rejoice to concur with the common reader; for by the
common sense of readers uncorrupted with literary prejudices, after all the
refinements of subtilty and the dogmatism of learning, must be finally decided
all claim to poetical honours. The Church-yard abounds with images which find a
mirrour in every mind, and with sentiments to which every bosom returns an
echo.”
Some works
of literature we love and respect without qualification. Our appreciation is
natural and unforced. That’s how I feel, for instance, about Tristram Shandy and the poems of Edgar
Bowers. Other works engender not dismissal but qualified admiration and
enjoyment. That’s how I would characterize my understanding of Gray’s “Elegy.”
The creakiness of some of the language gets in the way and the poem includes so
many well-known phrases that it can read like Bartlett’s Quotations: ““The paths of glory lead but to the grave,”
“Far from the
madding crowd’s ignoble strife,” et al. (Which can also be said of Johnson, not to mention Shakespeare.) All of which substantiates Johnson’s
point about the “common reader.”
Boswell, age
twenty-two, expresses mild disagreement with Johnson, who was fifty-three: “Here
let it be observed, that although his opinion of Gray’s poetry was widely
different from mine, and I believe from that of most men of taste, by whom it
is with justice highly admired, there is certainly much absurdity in the
clamour which has been raised, as if he had been culpably injurious to the
merit of that bard, and had been actuated by envy. “
Call it
civility, mutual respect or simple good manners. We all know people who cannot
be disagreed with, who judge an alternative opinion as a personal assault or
betrayal. The conversation between the friends turns theological and Boswell
reports: “Being at all times a curious examiner of the human mind, and pleased
with an undisguised display of what had passed in it, he called to me with
warmth, ‘Give me your hand; I have taken a liking to you.’”
No comments:
Post a Comment