Recent
history has provided us with a ready-made, one-word punchline useful in any
setting. When people have nothing of particular interest to add to a
conversation, and presume you are an intelligent fellow and thus in abject agreement
with all of their opinions, they shake their heads and add, with a world-weary look,
one word: “Trump.” As a conversational gambit, it’s more inclusive than “global
warming” or “capitalism,” other popular thought-stoppers. I don’t start
conversations expecting others to promptly endorse everything I say. That’s
dull, and your opinions and mine are generally the least important and
interesting things about us. Tell me what you know, what you’ve read or
experienced. Tell me a story or a joke and spare me the sermon, please.
Almost
two centuries ago, William Hazlitt (no mean conversational combatant) in “On People with One Idea,” diagnosed this form of social disease in a single sentence:
“There are people who have but one idea: at least, if they have more, they keep
it a secret, for they never talk but of one subject.” Some will think promptly
of proselytizing religious cranks, but they are outnumbered today by adherents
of our secular religion, politics. And talk of politics, sooner or later, turns
to anger, and anger is the most tedious of emotions (for its recipients, that
is; dispensers of anger love it like a drug). Hazlitt understands this:
“I
am not for `a collusion’ but `an exchange’ of ideas. It is well to hear what
other people have to say on a number of subjects. I do not wish to be always
respiring the same confined atmosphere, but to vary the scene, and get a little
relief and fresh air out of doors. Do all we can to shake it off, there is
always enough pedantry, egotism, and self-conceit left lurking behind; we need
not seal ourselves up hermetically in these precious qualities, so as to think
of nothing but our own wonderful discoveries, and hear nothing but the sound of
our own voice.”
Egotism
is eternal. We didn’t invent it, but have given it a new, casual, single-minded
ferocity, and one byproduct is the paucity of good conversation. Humor is
reduced to predictable Trump-bashing or Clinton-bashing, and that is almost
never funny. People want to be congratulated for the opinions they hold. Again,
Hazlitt nails it: “Though they run over a thousand subjects in mere gaiety of
heart, their delight still flows from one idea, namely, themselves.” For the
first time in my life, I’m aware that some of the people I meet might, without
warning, turn dangerously angry. A much later essayist, Eric Hoffer had it right
about much of our population, regardless of their ostensible politics. Anger and
stridency are nondenominational. In The
True Believer (1951), Hoffer writes:
“Passionate
hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life. Thus people haunted by
the purposelessness of their lives try to find a new content not only by
dedicating themselves to a holy cause but also by nursing a fanatical
grievance. A mass movement offers them unlimited opportunities for both.”
1 comment:
'Always respiring the same confined atmosphere ' - Hazlitt diagnoses the 'echo chamber' effect two centuries before the event!
Post a Comment