In
“The Symbol of the Archaic” he refers to “the automobile, the machine that
stole the city’s rationale for being, and made us all gypsies and barbarians
camping in the ruins of the one unit of civilization which man has thus far
evolved.” In “Hobbitry” he writes: “In the sad list of things that will always
be beyond me, philology is toward the top, up with my inability to drive an
automobile or pronounce the word `mirroring.’” And this, from the masterpiece among his essays,
“Finding”: “I walk everywhere, rejecting the internal combustion engine as an
effete surrender to laziness and the ignoble advantage of convenience.”
On
the one occasion I met Davenport, twenty-one years ago this month, I parked my
Toyota in front of his house on Sayre Avenue in Lexington, Ky. He made a
comment about my driving all the way from upstate New York – how had I endured
the noise, stink and tedium? I wasn’t surprised, having read his essays, but kept
a flare of defensiveness to myself, not wishing to acknowledge my embrace of “the
ignoble advantage of convenience.” He was right, I knew, but he wasn’t right. Reluctantly,
almost self-loathingly, I have to agree with the always contrary Karl Shapiro
in “Man on Wheels” (Selected Poems,
1968):
“Cars
are wicked, poets think.
Wrong
as usual. Cars are part of man.Cars are biological.
A man without a car is like a clam without a shell.
Granted, machinery is hell,
But carless man is careless and defenseless.
Ford is skin of present animal.
Automobile is shell.
You get yourself a shell or else.”
2 comments:
And I love my shell....
Yet in Davenport's essay "Finding" (I think it's called) he speaks warmly of riding in his father's cars out of town to look for arrowheads and other artifacts in the fields.
As it happens, today I scanned the essay "The Small Cars", collected in Randall Jarrell's Auden, Kipling, & Co. to email to a friend.
Post a Comment