“Extensile,
hair-fine sensibility informs these poems, and their subject matter—safely
imperceptible to the profane—is to be reverenced; `violets minute and scarce
where the great ants climb,’ `dear among the withered asters,’ `fish paler than
stones,’ the badger’s children creeping sideways out,’ `sunlight and daylight
fading upon the air like sound.’”
Moore’s
review (reprinted in The Complete Prose
of Marianne Moore, 1986) is almost poetry, with vocabulary borrowed from
Henry James. “Extensile” I associate with spiders and their webs. The Oxford English Dictionary gives us
“capable of being stretched out; extensible” and, for its second meaning, “of the tongue, a
tentacle, etc.: Capable of being protruded.” One thinks of a feeding frog
or lizard, though the first sense might apply to the extensile filament of
James’ late prose. All citations for “extensile” in the OED date from the nineteenth century, but a little reflection
brings up Eliot on James’ sensibility: “He had a mind so fine that no idea
could violate it.” This gets quoted as a punch line or comic putdown. In fact,
Eliot, writing in The Little Review
in 1918, is complimenting the novelist. Eliot’s preceding sentence reads:
“James’s critical genius comes out most tellingly in his mastery over, his
baffling escape from, Ideas; a mastery and an escape which are perhaps the last
test of a superior intelligence.” Among the poems included in The Wheel in Midsummer is “Remembered
Morning”:
“The
axe rings in the wood
And
the children come,Laughing and wet from the river;
And all goes as it should.
I hear the murmur and hum
Of their morning, forever.
“The
water ripples and slaps
The
white boat at the dock; The fire crackles and snaps.
The little noise of the clock
Goes on and on in my heart,
Of my heart parcel and part.
“O
happy early stir!
A
girl comes out on the porch,And the door slams after her.
She sees the wind in the birch,
And then the running day
Catches her into its way.”
Lewis
has already moved beyond her earlier Imagist manner. She uses rhyme. She enacts
“a baffling escape from, Ideas.” Not that ideas are absent; rather, they suffuse
the language, and there’s no need to hammer them home. In his preface to The Selected Poems of Janet Lewis
(Swallow Press/Ohio University Press, 2000), R.L. Barth rightly describes her
as a “domestic poet,” citing her
frequent references to “gardens, housework, children, domesticated animals.” He
also calls her an “occasional poet” because she writes about “quarrels between
friends, birthdays, friendship.” Barth precisely characterizes Lewis’
“hair-fine sensibility”:
“Let
me be honest, though: such adjectives – whether applied to war poets, domestic
poets, or whatever kinds of poets – merely address the superficial, that is to
say, the subject matter. Any perceptive reader recognizes immediately that,
whatever their domestic subject matter, the themes of many of the poems
transcend the merely domestic: love, death, memory, acceptance. We must not
confuse the subject matter with the themes.”
1 comment:
Patrick,
Your comments on Janet Lewis's poems, added to Bob Barth's acute observations, have given me new insights into the beauty of her "domestic" poems. Who else has caught those perceptions of daily life as memorably as she has?
Post a Comment