In this
setting, my math is rudimentary. I know the lecturer, and he’s smart and
articulate and knows how to speak to a mixed audience, but keeping up with his
reasoning, even with the accompaniment of PowerPoint slides, would for me be
comparable to following a lecture on Goethe in German. “Ich?” I know that. “Faust?”
I know that. So I prepped for the lecture by reading Theodore Dalrymple’s “As a Matter of Interest” in the new issue of New
English Review:
“With
books in existence such as Malay
Poisons who can possibly be bored? It seems unfair that death
should put an inevitable end to the delight of such unexpected discovery; but
perhaps if there were no end to it, there would be no delight in the first
place.”
A
welcome reminder. Dalrymple contrasts boredom with delight. Both are choices,
not givens. How often in life have I chosen
to be bored, as though to prove a point? Laziness and stubbornness conspire to ensure
a mulish case of tedium. With Dalrymple’s encouragement, I entered the lecture
hall with one thing in mind: What can I learn? I sat with a Russian mechanical
engineer of my acquaintance. “I know nothing about geophysics,” he said. “How
about you?”
1 comment:
"I am never forget the day I am given first original paper to write. It was on analytic and algebraic topology of locally Euclidean parameterization of infinitely differentiable Riemannian manifold.
Bozhe moi!
This I know from nothing."
- Tom Lehrer, Lobachevsky
Post a Comment