“His
politics is metaphysics, his metaphysics is history, his history is humanity
adrift in a labyrinth of its own making. In his heroic abundance he will catch
hold of any form—or invent a new one—to assess, judge, condemn, praise,
ruminate, fulminate, love; and once, in the name of literature, forgive.”
And she
celebrates the Age of Auden, before things fell apart:
“…form, in
those disparaged fifties, meant difficulty in the doing; meant the hard
practice of virtuosity; meant the plumbing of language for all its
metamorphoses and undiscovered metrics; meant the heritage of knowledge; meant,
in order to aspire to limitlessness, the pressure of limits—rhyme, even rhyme,
a thing of wit and brio, never an archaism. Poetry then had not yet fallen into
its present slough of trivia and loss of encompassment, the herding of random
images of minuscule perspective leading to a pipsqueak epiphany, a delirium of
incoherence delivered, monotone upon monotone, in the cacophony of a slam.”
And here,
writing of her unexpected reverence for the poet, she might be writing of another
of her masters, Saul Bellow:
“Auden
is a poet—no, the poet—of unembarrassed intellect. Ideas are his
emotions, emotions are his ideas. His successors and inheritors can be named in
an uncommonly short list—contemporary poets for whom the lyrical ear and the
all-seeing eye and the mind in fever are entwined with the breath and breadth
of the world; and to whom history, that multitudinous ghost, is no stranger.”
1 comment:
Love Ozick' s wonderful prose. As we live in an age where the intellect is an embarrassment, love her 'Auden is the poet of unembarrassed intellect.'She goes on with 'his ideas are his emotions - his emotions are his ideas.' This is a just refutation of Eliot' s suggestion that sensibility dissociated in the 17th century. The association of sensibility is what poetry is. Ozick is saying that Auden was living proof of this.
Post a Comment