The
most immediate reversal in bookish values spurred by Nabokov was my abrupt sense
of revulsion at Dostoevsky, which has never left me. The timing was critical. I’d
read the novels starting in seventh grade. The melodrama appealed to me, all
that Slavic angst, phony mysticism and sub-Dickensian comedy. A few years
later, when I read Nabokov’s wonderful monograph Nikolai Gogol, he gave a name to what attracted some of us to
Dostoevsky: poshlost. “Dusty,” as Nabokov dismissed him, is forever
linked with my callow, awkward, backward, soft-headed, pre-critical adolescence.
In his Paris Review interview with Herbert Gold in 1964 (collected in Strong Opinions), Nabokov glosses poshlost further:
“Corny
trash, vulgar clichés, Philistinism in all its phases, imitations of
imitations, bogus profundities, crude, moronic, and dishonest
pseudo-literature—these are obvious examples. Now, if we want to pin down poshlost in contemporary writing, we
must look for it in Freudian symbolism, moth-eaten mythologies, social comment,
humanistic messages, political allegories, overconcern with class or race, and
the journalistic generalities we all know.”
In
other words, things have degenerated even further in half a century. I never fell for Freud’s frauds
but Nabokov helped me see through such “puffed-up” (a favorite term of
dismissal) reputations as Thomas Mann, Maxim Gorky, D.H. Lawrence, Balzac, Thomas
Wolfe, Camus, Sartre, Brecht, Kazantzakis, Galsworthy, García Lorca and Rabindranath
Tagore (“a formidable mediocrity”). Today, it’s difficult to understand how
anyone took them seriously, but all were certified as “important” when I was a
young reader. We need guides, not gospel, so as not to get lost and tangled in
the underbrush of literature. Nabokov was my first and most influential. He could be wrong – about Robbe-Grillet and Salinger, for instance; but
he could be admirably right, as he was about Sterne, Melville and Beckett. The
author of Lolita, Pnin, Pale Fire and Speak, Memory was born on this date, April 23 – Shakespeare’s birthday –
in 1899, and died on July 2, 1977.
1 comment:
I'm currently reading Speak, Memory for the first time, and hadn't realized his view of Balzac. I get why the others you list were considered "puffed up", but I wouldn't lump the best of Balzac (e.g., Cousin Bette) with them. Or perhaps Balzac just hits some childish chord in me. Regardless, Speak, Memory is living up to its reputation as an extraordinary book.
Post a Comment