The
first and probably most formative of my anthologist-instructors was Oscar
Williams, a minor poet but a world-class collector of others’ work (Oct. 10 was
the fiftieth anniversary of his death). I bought Immortal Poems of the English Language and A Pocket Book of Modern Verse – small box-like paperbacks from
Washington Square Press with galleries of author portraits on the front and inside
the front and back covers. In them I first read Donne, W.S. Gilbert, Pound and
Karl Shapiro, among dozens of others. His anthologies were like Whitman
Samplers, and I savored them for years, including the samples from Whitman. Later
supplements to my education came from such anthologists as Louis Untermeyer, Yvor
Winters and Kenneth Fields, W.H. Auden, Kingsley Amis and Philip Larkin.
I’m
reading Larkin’s again, The Oxford Book
of Twentieth-Century English Verse (1973), and recalling what an eye-opener
it was. Larkin’s aim was at once scholarly and provocative. In his preface, he
defends his selection as “wide rather than deep representation.” When dealing with
the post-1914 generations, Larkin says his “loyalty turns perforce to poems
rather than to individuals.” Thus, he includes “This Houre Her Vigill,” a poem
by the marvelously named Irish diplomat Valentin Iremonger (1918-1991), whose
work I have otherwise never read. The same is true of K.W. (Karl Watts) Gransden (1925-1998), represented by “An Interview,” a mordantly comic poem
that appeared in Any Day (1960) but
seems unavailable online. These are poems and poets little known even to
English readers, I suspect. Minor? Yes, but also out of fashion, or never in
fashion, and wonderful to read. Both poets write as though Modernism had not
happened, which, of course, would have been just fine with Larkin. Art is not
about marching with the mob but doing what one does best. Both Iremonger and Gransden
give their attention to the dailiness of our days and remind me of an
observation made by the late D.G. Myers in an email from May 2013:
“I've
been thinking how much of life is absorbed with `small cares’ that seem
overwhelmingly important at the time--or at least disabling--which are
forgotten in the sequel: the headaches, stomach aches, the traffic jams, the
appointments which are late. Don’t these take up the majority of our time? They
almost never make it into literature, and in fact literature seems an
unstinting propaganda on behalf of the dramatic occurrences of human life. I
may try to write about the `small cares,’ but I'm not sure yet what I want today.”
This
reminds me of nothing so much as the gallant letter Larkin wrote to his
publisher, lobbying for publication of Barbara Pym’s novels:
“I
like to read about people who have done nothing spectacular, who aren’t
beautiful and lucky, who try to behave well in the limited field of activity
they command, but who can see, in the little autumnal moments of vision, that
the so called ‘big’ experiences of life are going to miss them; and I like to
read about such things presented not with self-pity or despair or romanticism,
but with realistic firmness and even humour.”
Anthologies
serve another function. They can rip familiar poems from their familiar
contexts and make them new. What could be more familiar than A Shropshire Lad, poems we’ve known from
childhood in the austere, title-less confines of Housman’s volumes? Larkin
selects eight of them, including “XL”:
“Into
my heart an air that kills
From yon far country blows:
What
are those blue remembered hills,
What spires, what farms are those?
“That
is the land of lost content,
I see it shining plain,
The
happy highways where I went
And cannot come again.”
The
line retained in memory was “blue remembered hills.” This time, “the land of
lost content” seemed charged full of extra meaning. “Yon far country” echoes
with a war undeclared for another two decades. Who would expect “happy highway”
in a Housman lyric?
No comments:
Post a Comment