“Wits
are never happy people. The anguish that has scraped their nerves and left them
raw to every flicker of life is the base of wit—for the raw nerve reacts at
once without any agent, the reaction is direct, with no integumentary
obstacles. Wit is the cry of pain, the true word that pierces the heart. If it
does not pierce, then it is not true wit. True wit should break a good man's
heart.”
We think
of wit as an aphoristic retort, a barbed bon
mot delivered with venomous aplomb. We think of Johnson and Wilde. But wit
comes in many forms, and not all are self-satisfied. Powell’s novels,
especially the later ones set in New York City, are deliciously witty, and she
knew something about anguish. So too are Hart’s lyrics witty, supremely so in
the American Songbook:
“Is your figure less than
Greek
Is your mouth a little
bit weak
When you open it to
speak, are you smart?”
Of course, that’s from “My
Funny Valentine,” a title already witty in a mere three words. For some reason,
Marmorstein leaves off the final two sentences of Powell’s diary entry quoted
above, and they’re the pierced heart of it. “Wits are never happy people,” yes,
but neither are witty words happy, affirming, empowering – name your poison.
Without the pain, wit isn’t witty, though it may be funny or merely cynical. Here
is wit imbued equally with humor, bite and melancholy. On this day, Oct. 19, in
1810, Charles Lamb writes a letter to William Wordsworth praising the latter’s “Essay on Epitaphs.” Lamb asks, “But what is the reason we have so few good Epitaphs after
all?” Being Lamb, he recommends the epitaphs to be found in “the Church yard of
Ditton upon Thames, if you know such a place,” which are “all different, and
all ingenious.” He adds (and one wonders how Wordsworth, not the wittiest of men, received it):
“I have seen in
Islington Churchy’d (I think) an Epitaph to an Infant who died `Ætatis four months,’ with this
seasonable inscription appended, `Honor thy Fathr. and Mothr. that thy days may
be long in the Land &c.’ —Sincerely wishing your children better.”
[In his 1935 edition of The Letters of Charles Lamb, Vol. II, E.V.
Lucas adds this note: “Lamb had begun his criticisms of churchyard epitaphs
very early: Talfourd tells that, when quite a little boy, after reading a
number of flattering inscriptions, he asked Mary Lamb: `Where do the naughty
people lie?’”]
No comments:
Post a Comment