I
remembered Dr. Johnson’s happy thought, as reported by Boswell, while reading The Gray Notebook by the Catalan writer
Josep Pla (1897-1981). I had never heard of Pla before this week nor have I
read any other work translated from Catalan. New York Review Books in 2013 performed
a service to English-language readers and published Peter Bush’s translation of
the journal Pla began keeping on his twenty-first birthday, on March 8, 1918,
and maintained for twenty months until he became the Paris correspondent for a
Barcelona newspaper. In his first entry he writes: “I’ll write whatever happens
— simply to pass the time — come what may.” Pla revised his journal throughout
his life, adding layers of thought and recollection, and polishing the prose, and
didn’t publish it until 1966, as part of the forty-five volumes of his complete
works. Most of his work consists of journalism, travel writing and other
nonfiction. In the passage that reminded me of Johnson’s observation, Pla
writes of his home town, Palafrugell, on Spain’s northeastern coast: “Gervasi’s
on plaça Nova is one of the most pleasant taverns in town to drop by. The wine
is usually good and the company is agreeable.”
Pla
goes on to describe the central role taverns play in Catalonian life, and while
doing so reveals his pride in being a provincial. He betrays no sense of cultural
inferiority, though neither is he a nationalist, Catalan or otherwise. Even as
a young man, Pla seems without pretensions:
“To
write the history of Gervasi’s tavern would be to write the history of my
beloved birthplace. It would be a peculiar history because, apart from being
very short, all that would stand out would be the absence of glorious deeds or
famous people. Many people, I suspect, would find this lack of brilliance
depressing. Personally, I am delighted to have been born in a town that has
produced no redeemer, no connoisseur of exotic sensations, no stentorian
preacher. It makes me feel light and free.”
Pla
would make ideal company in a tavern. His mind is practical, not given to
theory. He is amused by life, not outraged. He pays studious attention to his
surroundings and the way people speak. In all of this he reminds me of Sir John
Hawkins’ report in his Life of Johnson
(1787):
“In
contradiction to those, who, having a wife and children, prefer domestic
enjoyments to those which a tavern affords, I have heard [Dr. Johnson] assert,
that a tavern-chair was the throne of human felicity.—`As soon,’ said he, `as I
enter the door of a tavern, I experience an oblivion of care, and a freedom
from solicitude: when I am seated, I find the master courteous, and the
servants obsequious to my call; anxious to know and ready to supply my wants:
wine there exhilarates my spirits, and prompts me to free conversation and an
interchange of discourse with those whom I most love: I dogmatise and am
contradicted, and in this conflict of opinion and sentiments I find delight.’”
1 comment:
Yes that cut and thrust delineated in the final two lines of your post are true pleasure. A taking pleasure in the mental exploration of the human condition by challenging wrong-headed ideas about it. What fun!
Post a Comment