“Annoyed
because I had declined
to
print his poems—two frail barks,
unseaworthy,
I thought—he whined,
included
out-of-place remarks
“alleging
my incompetence,
then
added that I was too old
to
be an editor. What sense
he
may possess should tell him, `Hold
“your
pen! That’s agism! You’re daft!’
Why
burn a useful bridge? Instead,
acknowledge
that the poet’s craft
is
hard, success unsure. Ahead
“new
chances lie; but talk goes round—
Friends,
patrons, publishers might hear,
Concluding
that you’ve run aground.
Miranda
rights for this aren’t clear.
“Envoi
“You’re
doubtless waiting for my death.
Write
on, Sir, but don’t hold your breath.”
I
won’t publically play the “Who’s She Talking About?” game, but a lengthy list
of well-known whiners comes to mind. Here the envois to some of the other poems
in the sequence. This is from “On a Dyspeptic Reviewer” (“That good wits /
should be so used is almost vice, / and foolish also: picking nits / he may
himself acquire lice.”):
“Beware:
we know that critics’ spite,
a
boomerang, comes back to bite.”
And
this one, especially good, from “On an Erstwhile Editor, Feminist”:
“Let
race, class, gender nurse their bile;
diversity
cannot trump style.”
And
this, from “On an Anonymous Reviewer”:
“The
wheels of fortune surely turn;
your
book may be the next to burn.”
There’s
nothing new about the vanity of poets (and the rest of us) and the Hobbesian
world they inhabit. In 1733, Swift gave us their definitive field guide in “On Poetry: A R[h]apsody”:
“The
vermin only teaze and pinch
Their
foes superior by an inch.
So,
naturalists observe, a flea
Has
smaller fleas that on him prey;
And
these have smaller still to bite ’em,
And
so proceed ad infinitum.
Thus
every poet, in his kind,
Is
bit by him that comes behind:
Who,
though too little to be seen,
Can
teaze, and gall, and give the spleen;
Call
dunces, fools, and sons of whores,
Lay
Grub Street at each other’s doors.”
[ADDENDUM: A reader suggests Howard Nemerov's "On Being a Member of the Jury for a Poetry Prize:
"Jury’s the mot juste under our ground rules:
I may say Guilty, and mostly I do,
But sentencing’s beyond me, poeticules,
As, by your poems, it’s beyond most of you."]
[ADDENDUM: A reader suggests Howard Nemerov's "On Being a Member of the Jury for a Poetry Prize:
"Jury’s the mot juste under our ground rules:
I may say Guilty, and mostly I do,
But sentencing’s beyond me, poeticules,
As, by your poems, it’s beyond most of you."]
No comments:
Post a Comment