Any
sensitive plants in the audience, moved by their own daintiness of sensibility,
might have been offended. Larkin’s “Wants” (The
Less Deceived, 1955) is pretty grim, even by his mordant standards; almost provocatively
grim, as if he were tempting readers to argue him away from the edge of the
cliff. Or as if he were stylizing his well-known crankiness, almost caricaturing
it. Larkin is never one thing. John Gross, the polymathic man of letters, died Jan.
10, 2011, at the age of seventy-five, and a memorial service for him was held the
following March. It must have been a wonderful occasion. The music included
Schubert and Ella Fitzgerald. Friends read poems by Blake, Tennyson, Swinburne,
Hardy, Frost, Auden and Stevie Smith. Gross’ daughter Susanna read “Wants”:
“Beyond
all this, the wish to be alone
However
the sky grows dark with invitation cards
However
we follow the printed directions of sex
However
the family is photographed under the flagstaff
Beyond
all this, the wish to be alone.
“Beneath
it all, desire of oblivion runs:
Despite
the artful tensions of the calendar,
The
life insurance, the tabled fertility rites
The
costly aversion of the eyes from death—
Beneath
it all, desire of oblivion runs.”
One
suspects Gross never harbored such sentiments. He seems to have been too
good-hearted and generous of spirit. But he was likewise too acute a reader and
critic not to appreciate Larkin’s artfully comic meditation on solitude, the
obligations of sociability and death. Read Gross’ collected works and get the
education you probably missed in school. Read A Double Thread (2003), his memoir of growing up Jewish in London’s
East End, and, on a related theme, Shylock:
Four Hundred Years in the Life of a Legend (1993). His anthologies make for
excellent bedtime reading, in particular The
New Oxford Book of English Prose
(1998) and After Shakespeare: Writing Inspired
by the World’s Greatest Author (2002). His masterwork is The Rise and Fall of the Man of Letters
(1991; rev. ed. 1991), in which he writes a love song to literature:
“Isn’t
there a certain basic antagonism between the very nature of a university and
the very spirit of literature? The academic mind is cautious, tightly
organized, fault-finding, competitive – and above all aware of other academic
minds…Think of the whole idea of regarding literature as a discipline.
Literature can be strenuous or difficult or deeply disturbing; it can be a
hundred things – but a discipline is not one of them. Discipline means compulsion,
and an interest in literature thrives on spontaneity, eager curiosity, the
anticipation of pleasure; it is unlikely that a reader who comes to a book
under duress, or weighed down with a sense of duty, will ever really read it at
all, however much he may learn about it. Even the most intensely serious
literature needs to be approached with a certain lightness of heart, if it is
to yield its full intensity.”
Today,
such words might as well be written in Linear B: “an interest in literature
thrives on spontaneity, eager curiosity, the anticipation of pleasure.”
[Here,
the writer’s son, Tom Gross, has collected numerous tributes to his father,
including videos of the poems read at the memorial service. Here, Larkin reads “Wants”
as he walks away from the camera, along the river bank, at the conclusion of
the 1964 Monitor television program with
John Betjeman.]
2 comments:
Gross's comments on the University approach to literature surely extend to teaching younger students too. Here the trick is to ensure that formal literary education does not put youngsters off literature, making it seem a kind of punishment inflicted on the young for unknown transgressions. Enormous numbers are spoiled for life when it comes to Shakespeare, for instance.
Poor Larkin! You have to condole or, perhaps, commiserate, with the man.
Post a Comment