Holbrook
Jackson appends three epigraphs to Bookman’s
Pleasure: A Recreation for Booklovers (1947), including one from The Rambler #159: “The utmost which we
can reasonably hope or fear, is to fill a vacant hour with prattle and be
forgotten.” No wonder Beckett loved Dr. Johnson, though the larger context
moderates somewhat the blow to our vanity when the sentence is read in
isolation:
“The
truth is, that no man is much regarded by the rest of the world. He that
considers how little he dwells upon the condition of others will learn how
little the attention of others is attracted by himself. While we see multitudes
passing before us, of whom perhaps not one appears to deserve our notice or
excite our sympathy, we should remember, that we likewise are lost in the same
throng, that the eye which happens to glance upon us is turned in a moment on
him that follows us, and that the utmost which we can reasonably hope or fear,
is to fill a vacant hour with prattle and be forgotten.”
Some
words seem genetically imbued with the DNA of a single writer and his
sensibility. If sere, descry, tinct and pallid belong
to Keats, Johnson owns cant and its
second-cousin, prattle. The OED defines the noun form as “foolish,
inconsequential, or incomprehensible talk; childish chatter; gossip or small
talk,” rooted in the Middle Low German prātelen,
“to chatter, to babble, to cackle.” The word is also used figuratively to mean
“something resembling chatter or prattle, as the sound of birdsong, running
water, etc.,” as in Louis MacNeice’s “Prattle of water, palaver [another “p”
word meaning empty chatter, like persiflage
and piffle] of starlings in a
disused chimney.” In his Dictionary,
Johnson defines prattle bluntly and memorably
as “empty talk, trifling loquacity.” I like the sound of prattle, its echo of rattle (as in bones) and battle – further evidence of our vanity.
Jackson
describes his anthology as a “composite portrait of a writer of books,” hinting
at “what writers of books think of their predecessors, their contemporaries,
and themselves.” Johnson is represented by more than twice as many quotations
as Shakespeare, and the only writer showing up more often is Carlyle.
Unsurprisingly, the cranky Scotsman also took a shine to prattle, though not in Jackson’s anthology. It shows up often in
his letters, as in this one to his long-suffering wife, Jane Welsh Carlyle, on Aug. 24, 1831: “Lastly, write, write, O write abundantly, were it the merest
prattle, it is better to me than all eloquence.” Of course, Ambrose Bierce
christened his long-running newspaper column "Prattle." In its best-known appearance, Bierce wrote the definitive deflation of Oscar Wilde after the Irish gasbag’s visit
to San Francisco in 1882:
“That
sovereign of insufferables, Oscar Wilde has ensued with his opulence of twaddle
and his penury of sense. He has mounted his hind legs and blown crass
vapidities through the bowel of his neck, to the capital edification of
circumjacent fools and foolesses, fooling with their foolers. He has tossed off
the top of his head and uttered himself in copious overflows of ghastly bosh.”
2 comments:
The Bierce (in full) is wonderful. Imagine Mencken's pedigree must derive from this stable.
Mencken knew Bierce, and wrote an interesting essay on him.
But I think that Yeats, in his Autobiographies wrote quite sober criticism that Wilde would have found more painful. For example,
"[Wilde] might have had a career like that of Beaconsfield, whose early style resembles his, being meant for crowds, for hurried decisions, for immediate triumphs. Such men get their sincerity, if at all, from the contact of events; the dinner-table was Wilde's event and made him the greatest talker of his time, and his plays and dialogues have what merit they possess from being now an imitation, now a record of his talk."
Elsewhere Yeats speaks of a "vague impressiveness" that could not hold "an accurate ear." There isn't a bit of contumely in this, but Wilde might have found it harder to take.
Post a Comment