“The
rest of my education was acquired haphazard in a public library. It was a very
good library, run by an Englishman who took his work seriously; yet, in spite
of that, and in spite of the fact that I became a public librarian myself,
public libraries seem to me terrible places with a degrading air of
institutionalism and of pseudo-professionalism.”
I’ve
known people too uppity to use a public library. Patronizing one would imply they couldn't afford to buy their own books, and there’s something so common about reading volumes already manhandled by others. But I’ve
never been squeamish. If libraries issued degrees like universities, my name
would trail a dozen sets of initials. That’s where my true education took place,
“haphazard” or otherwise, certainly not in classrooms or lecture halls. The
writer cited above is Frank O’Connor (1903-1966), born Michael O’Donovan in Cork, Ireland,
whose stories I first read in a volume borrowed from the central library on
Superior Avenue in Cleveland. The passage is drawn from a slender book, hardly
more than a pamphlet, Towards an
Appreciation of Literature, published in 1945 by the Metropolitan
Publishing Co., 32 Bachelor’s Walk, Dublin.
O’Connor
was born into real poverty. He represents a human type I admire – the self-driven,
self-educated man or woman, often without a university education, who reads,
studies and learns for the love of it, as naturally as some people pick up golf
or a second language (examples: Dr. Johnson, Abraham Lincoln, Louis Armstrong).
In our age, when everyone goes to college, few are educated. O’Connor describes “your
true auto-didact” as “a tough Alpine plant, and though not very beautiful in
himself, [he] is guaranteed to grow almost anywhere with the minimum of
attention.” Of course, O’Connor is projecting his own life story, and he goes on to describe teaching himself to read German and, in the meantime, reading all of
Goethe in English. Of course, in his “simple optimism,” and without guidance,
an autodidact risks missing the contexts and the nuances of what he reads. O’Connor
says “I had left school before we got so far as long division, and I was twenty
before I found out what the simplest grammatical terms meant.” His explanation
for that Irish boy’s infatuation with literature is true to my experience:
“I
came to literature as I fancy a great many people come to it, because they need
companionship, and a wider and more civilized form of life than they can find
in the world about them, all the more since that world is being more and more
steadily drained of whatever beauty it had; but the city of literature is just
as big and complicated as any other capital, and a man can be just as lonely
there. It has its sharks and bores, its snobbish quarters and stews, and a
great many quiet suburbs where all sorts of obscure and attractive people live.”
When
he gets to the particulars, O’Connor recounts the writers who formed him,
including Austen, Turgenev, Trollope and Chekhov. “For me, and I think for most
of my generation,” he writes, “the experience of literature came through the
study of the 19th-century novel, and our views of literature are largely
coloured and limited by that particular approach.” Serious readers would agree
with him that “the 19th-century novel still seems to me incomparably the
greatest of the modern arts, the art in which the modern world has expressed
itself most completely.”
Like
any work by an intelligent autodidact, O’Connor’s little survey is pleasingly wayward
and argumentative. He ranks Boswell higher than Johnson (a not indefensible
argument, though I can’t agree). He rightly lauds Shakespeare, Swift and Saint-Simon. He
mentions few Americans, and Melville and Henry James not at all. O’Connor says
of literature, in his final paragraph, that it is “communication, and while it
lifts the burden of solitude and puts us in contact with other minds, it puts
us in contact with their doubts and fears as well as their pleasures and hopes.”
Last
Tuesday, May 10, was the fiftieth anniversary of O’Connor’s death.
1 comment:
Some years ago, for a blessedly brief time, my wife insisted that I slip library books into a plastic bag at checkout, and freeze them when I arrived home in order to rid them of bed bug infestation.
Here is the procedure used by the University of Washington libraries to eliminate bed bugs in suspicious books.
"The UW Libraries have developed a protocol in which they seal potentially infested books in plastic bags and freeze them at temperatures below 18 degrees Fahrenheit for one week. Then the books are allowed to unthaw and be a room temperature for 6 days. And then are re-frozen for another week in case any surviving eggs have hatched"
The checkout period for public library books in my town is four weeks, which promotes some haste in reading thawed books if one follows this procedure.
Post a Comment