While
reading the new critical edition of Edmund Blunden’s 1928 memoir of World War I,
Undertones of War (Oxford, 2015), edited
by John Greening, I happened on an unexpected series of pleasing observations by
the poet. I knew Blunden (1896-1974) was a gentle, bookish, somewhat melancholy soul, a lover of
nature and famously forgiving as a reviewer of books. But here is a passage
from Blunden’s introduction written for the 1964 edition of his memoir,
included by Greening in his notes:
“I
have been blamed for being too amiable over the old War. Even on the cricket
field once an incoming batsman, at a convenient moment, told me that he was one
of my readers and thought it a good book, although he had determinedly refused
to take part in the War himself; but, for all my good points, I had written
about it like a child who was happy with a bag of sweets.”
For
the American reader, cricket references rival allusions to Linear B in
their opacity. In this case, the casual exercise of literary criticism on the
cricket field is charming and gentlemanly. Blunden’s cricket-playing critic
gets him right. The poet continues:
“An
author is not likely to be his own best defence on questions of tone and
balance, especially in the middle of a pleasant time-cheating game; but I can
still feel that the happiness of life does not altogether depend on its being
without its `agonies’ (Keats’ word), and that there are times when, with all
that had passed and all that was obviously pending in our minds, we could be
astonishingly happy.”
Blunden’s
equanimity is enviable and defies belief, though friends and acquaintances have
almost unanimously confirmed it. This was a man commissioned at age nineteen as
a second lieutenant in the Royal Sussex Regiment. He served for almost two
years on the Western Front, took part in the engagements at Ypres and the Somme,
and was awarded the Military Cross. The source of the “agonies” allusion is unspecified.
Keats often used the word in letters (especially those to Fanny Brawne) and
poems, as in “Modern Love”:
“Fools!
if some passions high have warm’d the world,
If
Queens and Soldiers have play’d deep for hearts,
It
is no reason why such agonies
Should
be more common than the growth of weeds.”
Here
is the conclusion of Blunden’s paragraph, written almost half a century after
the Armistice:
“It
may have had some connection with our seeing every day the degrees of valour,
honour, generosity and justice of which many good men were capable. In the
appreciation of human nature which this meant, what was the calendar? All was
concentrated into a seemingly short length of days. We very quickly saw and
were reanimated by the spirit of man as it shone in, say, those who would be
officially called `reinforcements’. But then then too there was humour about
the place.”
No comments:
Post a Comment