“Different
branches of knowledge have always lived together in peace. Both anatomy and
belles-lettres are of equally noble descent; they have identical goals and an
identical enemy—the devil—and there is absolutely no reason for them to fight.”
Knowledge
arrives in many forms, not always through the lens of a microscope. I would
hate to live in a world without scientific instruments, but I would equally
regret life without Proust. At their extremes, the rival camps might be
characterized as Positivists and Aesthetes. Chekhov was neither. He happily embodied
the integration of both worlds. He wrote the passage above on this date, May
15, in 1889, in a letter to Alexi Suvorin, his editor, literary champion and friend, who
was also (much to Chekhov’s disgust) a rancid anti-Semite and anti-Dreyfusard. The
translators are Michael Henry Heim and Simon Karlinsky (Letters of Anton Chekhov, 1973), and the context is publication of Paul
Bourget’s potboiler Le Disciple.
As always,
Chekhov impresses us with his equanimity, his immunity to any sort of rancor or
fanaticism, political or otherwise. Doctor and writer, he saw no contradiction in his chosen vocations (the same can be said of Keats, and even of Céline and
William Carlos Williams). Chekhov writes:
“If a man
knows the theory of the circulatory system, he is rich. If he learns the
history of religion and the song `I Remember a Marvelous Moment’ in addition,
he is the richer, not the poorer, for it. We are consequently dealing entirely
in pluses. It is for this reason that geniuses have never fought among
themselves and Goethe the poet coexisted splendidly with Goethe the naturalist.”
[In a footnote, Karlinsky writes of the song mentioned by Chekhov: “An art song
by Mikhail Glinka, which is the setting of one of Alexander Pushkin’s most popular
lyrics.”]
Not a
fanatic himself, Chekhov could write clinically of the type. Consider the case
of Dr. Yevgeny Lvov in his play Ivanov,
who treats others not as individuals but as ideological caricatures. In his
letter, Chekhov continues:
“It is not
branches of knowledge that war with one another, not poetry with anatomy; it is
delusions, that is, people. When a person doesn’t understand something, he
feels discord within. Instead of looking for the causes of this discord within
himself as he should, he looks outside. Hence the war with what he does not
understand.”
1 comment:
Wonderful passages. Thank you for sharing them.
Post a Comment