From Jörg
Baberowski’s Scorched Earth: Stalin’s
Reign of Terror (Yale University Press, 2016):
“Maxim
Gorky, writer of the proletarian revolution and despiser of rural Russia, had
been dreaming of reeducating the man of old long before the revolution. He
shared Lenin’s belief that peasants and workers were a malleable mass that
could be shaped by the hands of enlightened educators. But how, they both
asked, could communism be built with a `mass of human material’ that had been
`tainted by slavery, serfdom and capitalism’ for centuries? Their answer, which
left no room for ambiguity, was that if barbarians were to become New Men then
their environment needed to be turned into a disciplinary machine.”
Gorky was
not the first writer who longed to transcend mere literature and impose his
schemes for betterment on the world, and his successors are still with us,
scolding and biding their time. As early as Oct. 22, 1901, Chekhov, in a letter
to Alexi Peshkov (Gorky’s given name), suggested that the younger writer avoid
stereotyping the “wavering, high-strung intellectuals” among the characters in
his play The Philistines. On the other hand, Gorky romanticizes Nil, his single-minded revolutionary hero. Chekhov argues that all the
characters are “equally valuable human beings." In his note to the letter in The
Letters of Anton Chekhov (1973), Simon Karlinsky writes: “But this idea was
quite foreign to Gorky.” One of his intellectual characters in The Philistines, Tatyana, attempts
suicide when her romantic longing for Nil is not reciprocated. Her unhappiness should
not arouse pity or sympathy, Gorky replied to Chekhov, “but something else,
much less attractive.” Karlinsky writes:
“Gorky’s
anti-intellectualism became more pronounced in subsequent years. One of its
ugliest manifestations is described in Nadezhda Mandelstam’s Hope Against Hope, in which we find
Gorky using his august position in the post-revolutionary literary life to
deprive the freezing and starved poet Osip Mandelstam of the pair of trousers
he needed to survive through the
winter. `The trousers themselves were a small matter,’ wrote Mandelstam’s
widow, `but they spoke eloquently of Gorky’s hostility to a literary trend that
was foreign to him.”
Elsewhere in
Hope Against Hope, Nadezhda Mandelstam reports that when informed of the poet Nikolay Gumilyov’s pending execution, Gorky
did nothing. With Osip Mandelstam and Anna Akhmatova, Gumilyov was founder of the
poetic movement called Acmeism. In his 1913 essay “The Morning of Acmeism”, Mandelstam defines it as “a yearning for world culture.” On Aug. 26, 1921, as
Guy Davenport puts it in “The Man without Contemporaries” (The Geography of the Imagination,
1981), Gumilyov “crumbled under the volleys of a Soviet firing squad, clutching
a Bible and a Homer to his heart.” Sixty others died with him. His crime:
membership in the nonexistent Tagantsev conspiracy, an entrapment scheme
devised by Feliks Dzerzhinsky, founder of the Cheka. In 1932, Gorky was
decorated with the Order of Lenin, as were, later, Fidel Castro, Erich
Honecker, Tito, Nelson Mandela and Stalin. Baberowski writes:
“The
rhetoric the regime used to justify its misdeeds spoke of cold calculation but
also of pure and simple hatred. The hatred was for the `wretched, stubborn
reality,’ as Maxim Gorky, the wordsmith of Communism, had described the peasant
world. This was a world, he wrote, that should be torn out at the roots `from
the memory of the human soul’ and made to disappear forever.”
No comments:
Post a Comment