“This
is the excellent foppery of the world, that, when we are sick in fortune, often
the surfeit of our own behaviour, we make guilty of our disasters the sun, the
moon, and the stars; as if we were villains on necessity; fools by heavenly
compulsion; knaves, thieves, and treachers by spherical pre-dominance; drunkards,
liars, and adulterers by an enforc’d obedience of planetary influence; and all
that we are evil in, by a divine thrusting
on.”
Shakespeare’s
usage illustrates the first meaning recorded in the OED: “a foolish action, practice, idea, statement, etc.; a folly,
an absurdity.” Only later did a secondary and eventually predominant meaning
emerge, contingent on the social recognition of fops: “The behaviour or manner characteristic of a
fop; silly affectation of elegance; coxcombry, dandyism.” While rereading his “Detached Thoughts on Books and Reading” (1822), I found Charles Lamb drawing on both
meanings:
“To
be strong-backed and neat-bound is the desideratum of a volume. Magnificence
comes after. This, when it can be afforded, is not to he lavished upon all
kinds of books indiscriminately. I would not dress a set of Magazines, for
instance, in full suit. The dishabille, or half-binding (with Russia backs
ever) is our costume. A Shakspeare [sic],
or a Milton (unless the first editions), it were mere foppery to trick out in
gay apparel. The possession of them confers no distinction.”
No comments:
Post a Comment