“. . . he
was and remains a towering intellectual presence in British national culture,
an example of the rooted loyalty to `things by law established’ that has been,
among so many Anglophone conservatives, their substitute for abstract argument.
What Johnson believed he also exemplified, which was a firm moral sense
combined with a robust eccentricity of manner and a deep respect for aesthetic
values.”
In Conservatism (Profile Books, 2017),
Roger Scruton traces a strain of conservatism to two
eighteenth-century figures, David Hume and Dr. Johnson, antagonists in their
day. Johnson disapproved of Hume’s skepticism toward Christianity, and Boswell
reports Hume spoke of Johnson “in a very illiberal manner.” Nevertheless,
Scruton writes: “Neither thinker dissented from the emerging individualist
philosophy, and both regarded liberty as the foundation and the goal of
civilized order.” And neither had any use for the pernicious silliness of
Rousseau and his “social contract.”
For Johnson,
established institutions – the church, but also the state – were what Scruton calls “the
heart of political order.” Yet one remembers the lines Johnson contributed to
Oliver Goldsmith’s 1764 poem “The Traveller”:
“How small,
of all that human hearts endure,
That part
which laws or kings can cause or cure.
Still to
ourselves in every place consign’d,
Our own
felicity we make or find.”
Johnson is
so stirring a figure as man and writer because, despite poverty, and mental and
physical illness, he took responsibility for what he said and did, and for
what he wrote. He had no reflex to blame others for his condition and little capacity for self-pity. Scruton
writes:
“Johnson’s
eccentric habits . . . made his defence of orthodoxy all the more impressive. The
search for the right opinion, the correct response, the sensible emotion was
also, in Johnson’s world, an expression of the highest freedom. He could be
haughty and compassionate, indignant and remorseful by turns, but in everything
he responded to the world with an exalted sense of responsibility for his own
existence. Freedom, for Johnson, was not an escape from obligations, but a call
to obey them, whether or not they have been consciously chosen.”
Here is a
favorite passage from Johnson’s A Journey
to the Western Islands of Scotland (1775), one Boswell so admired he
reproduced it in the Life:
“To abstract
the mind from all local emotion would be impossible, if it were endeavoured,
and would be foolish, if it were possible. Whatever withdraws us from the power
of our senses; whatever makes the past, the distant, or the future predominate
over the present, advances us in the dignity of thinking beings. Far from me
and from my friends be such frigid philosophy, as may conduct us indifferent
and unmoved over any ground which has been dignified by wisdom, bravery, or
virtue. That man is little to be envied, whose patriotism would not gain force
upon the plain of Marathon, or whose piety would not grow warmer among the
ruins of Iona.”
No comments:
Post a Comment