Clive James moved me to find “A Problem,” a poem by Robert Conquest he calls a
“philosophical disquisition made fully poetic,” and I found it in Conquest’s New and Collected Poems (Hutchinson,
1988). It appears not to be available online, which is a shame. Its six
eight-line stanzas are set in Liguria, Eugenio Montale’s native region. It
opens with “Liguria tingles with peculiar light. / The sea and sky exchange
their various blues,” and at first reads like a travelogue with exotic scene-setting.
Sun, rocks, dry weeds, the sea. Then the aperture opens wider: “And here / Man
might, as well as anywhere, / Combine his landscapes and philosophies.” The
next stanza and a half return to the painterly mode, followed by this:
“Where
wood and sea and sky and hill
Give static
broad simplicities, its course
At
once more complex and more simple
Appears
to thought as an example,
Like the
complex, simple movement of great verse.”
For
Conquest, the stark landscape becomes a model for verse-making – clarity, no excess
or clutter, a classically elegant melding of elements. The poem builds energy
and philosophical density in the fourth stanza:
“Gaze in
that liquid crystal; let it run,
Some simple,
fluent structure of the all,
No
many-corridored dark Escorial,
But,
poem or stream, a Parthenon:
The clear
completeness of a gnomic rhyme;
Or,
off the beat of pure despair
But
purer to the subtler ear,
The
assonance of eternity with time.”
The last line
is gorgeous, made more so by Conquest rhyming “rhyme” and “time.” Now the final
stanza:
“Till then,
or till forever, those who’ve sought
Philosophies
like verse, evoking verse,
Must take,
as I beneath these junipers,
Empiric
rules of joy and thought,
And be
content to break the idiot calm;
While
many poems that dare not guide
Yet
bring the violent world inside
Some girl’s
ephemeral happiness and charm.”
James
later in his essay writes: “Complex simplicity means a phrase, a line, and sometimes a
whole poem that makes a virtue out of incorporating its intellectual structure
into its musical progression, and vice versa: it is always a two-way thing, a
thermocouple of gold and platinum, but without the capacity of those two
precious metals to give a precisely calculable effect."
I’ve also
been reading Shakespeare’s Metrical Art
(University of California Press, 1988) by George T. Wright, which reaffirms my
love of meter and rhyme, and not only in Shakespeare. Most of the rest of what
passes for poetry seems flaccid and flabby. Here’s Wright:
“Iambic
pentameter survives in twentieth-century verse in a dwindling remnant of superb practitioners, most notably Yeats,
Stevens, Eliot, Berryman, Lowell, Larkin, Wilbur, Merrill, Hecht, and
Hollander, for some of whom, as for the poets of the Renaissance, the regular
meter once again seems a figure for normal life, departure from it a trope for
individual eccentricity, manner, or mania. Rarely, however, does ‘normal life’ mean
anything so grand as `the cosmic order’; and departures from it usually have
the effect, at best, of elegant pathos rather than high tragedy. The world has
changed, and iambic pentameter, whose deepest connections must always be to
contemporaneous world-views, has had to change with it. Verse at present, which
always somewhat blindly chooses its forms, has made other arrangements for
mirroring the world, and iambic pentameter is no longer conspicuous on the
program.”
No comments:
Post a Comment