In The Idler #34, published on this date,
Dec. 9, in 1758, Dr. Johnson tells us “the qualities requisite to conversation
are very exactly represented by a bowl of punch.” The rest of
the essay amounts to an ingeniously elaborated metaphor:
“Punch, says
this profound investigator, is a liquor compounded of spirit and acid juices,
sugar and water. The spirit, volatile and fiery, is the proper emblem of
vivacity and wit; the acidity of the lemon will very aptly figure pungency of
raillery, and acrimony of censure; sugar is the natural representative of
luscious adulation and gentle complaisance; and water is the proper
hieroglyphick of easy prattle, innocent and tasteless.”
Often Johnson’s
essays read like sermons – wise but culpatory, though he seldom sequesters himself
from the guilty. But this Idler is
different. He makes his moral points wittily, noting that good conversation
succeeds by “tempering the acidity of satire with the sugar of civility, and
allaying the heat of wit with the frigidity of humble chat.” That, of course,
is precisely what he is doing in his essay. Swift described conversation as a “useful
and innocent pleasure.” And yet, how seldom it is. Talk in a social setting is
likelier to be complaining, pontificating or inane verbal gestures – more like near-beer
or Mad Dog 20/20 than punch. Increasingly, conversations turn into ad hominem ego-fests, the opposite of what
Michael Oakeshott prescribed in “The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind” (Rationalism in Politics and
Other Essays, 1962). For him, conversation was the model for living a
civilized life: “Conversation is not an enterprise designed to yield an
extrinsic profit, a contest where a winner gets a prize, not is it an activity
of exegesis; it is an unrehearsed intellectual adventure.” Recently I reread
Timothy Steele’s 1983 interview with J.V. Cunningham, whom he describes like
this:
“He is no
more given to wasting words in conversation than to wasting them in poems, and
when he says something one feels in the utterance a weight of care and
reflection. At the same time, his speech and personality possess a quiet
sympathy which makes him an engaging as well as an enlightening
conversationalist.”
No comments:
Post a Comment