It’s not
about self-expression. The idea that everyone carries around a latent book awaiting
optimal circumstances before entering the world accounts for much of the lousy writing
that clogs the market. We know we will never compose a symphony or cast a life-size
statue in bronze – too much equipment and specialized training and knowledge required.
But any semi-literate twit can open a Word document and gush. Teachers abet this
delusion, as do critics and publishers. Non-writers (in the professional sense)
on rare occasions produce worthy books – think of Pepys, Dickinson, Yevgenia Ginzburg
and J.A. Baker. But they are gloriously serendipitous freaks of nature, testimonies
to human aspiration. The sentiment Bruce Bennett relates in “On Not Reading” (Just Another Day in Just Another Town: Poems
New and Selected 2000-2016, 2017) both affirms the romantic notion of “Everyone’s
a Writer!” and subverts it:
“I used to
read a lot:
that Russian
crew;
Kafka,
Cortazar, Borges;
Nabokov too.
“Now all I
do is write.
I feel left
out.
I miss not
knowing what
life is
about
“As brought
to us in books
those masters
penned.
But I’ve
grown too aware
How it must
end
Not to try
on my own
to make it
stay
through words
that get it down
in my own
way.”
The argument
(the speaker’s, if not Bennett’s) recalls “A Study of Reading Habits” and its
well-known, out-of-context closing line: “Books are a load of crap.” Few, of
course, can write without first having read. Every sentence acknowledges a
forbear, even if the writer remains blithely unaware of his debt. There is no
novelty and if there were, we would probably close the book on it. I’ve always
thought the most respectable reason for writing is the desire to make something
we want to read but can’t find in the library. If I were to stop reading, I too
would “feel left out,” as Bennett tells us. Books are life. In another poem, “Of
Making Books, Yet Again,” he writes:
“Why else
would we beat head and heart
and fists
against a wall?
In vain we
vainly love our art,
and Vanity
is all.”
1 comment:
Thanks for posting this, Patrick. Recently in poetry, it hasn't been the facile emotional gush as much as pre-approved moral certainty that typifies the mediocre. The Zeitgeist has no nuance and is strident, aggrieved, ahistorical. Ron Slate (ronslate@comcast.net)
Post a Comment