“His parents
sent a basket from Wem [a town in Shropshire] containing pigs’ cheeks (a
delicacy), two fowl, some pickled pork, and a tongue. He took it along and,
when it was empty, they set about a bottle of port and some fine Virginia tobacco.
It was a Christmas to remember.”
Some people
will eat anything. My father relished pigs’ knuckles and blood sausage. He
would have concurred with Joyce’s Jewish Everyman: “Mr Leopold Bloom ate with
relish the inner organs of beasts and fowls. He liked thick giblet soup, nutty
gizzards, a stuffed roast heart, liverslices fried with crustcrumbs, fried
hencods’ roes. Most of all he liked grilled mutton kidneys which gave to his
palate a fine tang of faintly scented urine.”
My own food
preferences evolved in reverse. I ate almost anything as a kid, even liver and
onions. Only when working in a restaurant and having to cook liver did I lose
my taste for it. Now I am borderline-finicky, almost a vegetarian. Not a single
item on Mr. Bloom’s menu would I voluntarily eat today. The recipient of the
basket mentioned at the top is William Hazlitt, as described in Duncan Wu’s William Hazlitt: The First Modern Man
(2008). It was Christmas 1806, and Hazlitt was spending the holiday with
Charles and Mary Lamb. Lamb’s two-act farce, “Mr. H--,” had premiered and
promptly bombed at Drury Lane on Dec. 10. Hazlitt had attended, and reported that
Lamb himself sat in the pit, enthusiastically hissing his own play. One can see
why. As Wu explains: “The play’s premise
was as silly as anything in Monty Python – that Mr H--, who did all he could to
conceal his name, was actually called Hogsflesh.” As soon as that was revealed,
the steam went out of the drama and the audience lost interest. In fact, they
positively detested it.” Hazlitt, however, wrote rather kindly of the play in “On Great and Little Things.”
You will have noted the porcine theme, one that Lamb (a meaty surname) often revisited, most
famously in “A Dissertation Upon Roast Pig.” His colleague at India House, John
Bates Dibdin, had drawn a picture of a pig after Lamb had published his essay
in London Magazine in September 1822.
Lamb included the picture in Essays of
Elia when the book was published in 1823. On Oct. 28 of that year, Lamb writes
to Dibdin:
“Your Pig
was a picture of a pig, and your
Picture a pig of a picture. The
former was delicious but evanescent, like a hearty fit of mirth, or the
cracking of thorns under a pot; but the latter is an idea, and abideth. I never before saw swine upon sattin. And then
that pretty strawy canopy about him! He seems to purr (rather than grunt) his
satisfaction. Such a gentlemanlike porker too! . . . I have ordered a little gilt
shrine for it, and mean to wear it for a locket; a shirt pig.”
I can’t
think of any writer before Lamb who so specializes in the silly and ridiculous.
His taste for the gratuitously absurd seems pleasingly modern.
No comments:
Post a Comment