“My reading
has been lamentably desultory and immethodical. Odd, out of the way, old
English plays, and treatises, have supplied me with most of my notions, and
ways of feeling. In every thing that relates to science, I am a whole
Encyclopædia behind the rest of the world.”
It was the
final sentence that came back to me. My job title is “science writer,” which
makes me something of a fraud. What science I know has been learned on the fly,
usually while trying to learn something else. The last formal science class I
took was “Human Genomics,” and that was in 2002. Otherwise, my scientific
training is an autodidact’s dabbling. My mind is not scientific but helplessly
intuitive. I sympathize entirely with Lamb (who exaggerates):
“I have no
astronomy. I do not know where to look for the Bear, or Charles’s Wain; the
place of any star; or the name of any of them at sight. I guess at Venus only
by her brightness — and if the sun on some portentous morn were to make his
first appearance in the West, I verily believe, that, while all the world were
gasping in apprehension about me, I alone should stand unterrified, from sheer
incuriosity and want of observation.”
Like others
among the ignorant, I like to give the appearance of learning, and my mind is acquisitive
enough to sometimes pull it off. How I hate not to know something worth
knowing. Again, Lamb is my ally:
“. . . a man
may do very well with a very little knowledge, and scarce be found out, in
mixed company; every body is so much more ready to produce his own, than to
call for a display of your acquisitions.”
Lamb spells
out the risks our kind run: “But in a tête-à-tête
there is no shuffling. The truth will out. There is nothing which I dread so
much, as the being left alone for a quarter of an hour with a sensible,
well-informed man, that does not know me.”
No comments:
Post a Comment