Samuel
Taylor Coleridge was an Olympic-class gas-bag who never met a particular he
couldn’t turn into an airy generality – the anti-Johnson. He was afflicted with
the disease of theory, an ailment only encouraged by his daily intake of laudanum.
But a man who opined as often and as strenuously as Coleridge had to be on to
something at least occasionally. The observation above is dated May 28, 1830 in
Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel
Taylor Coleridge (1835). America was then a newly minted country,
adolescent in its pride and sensitivities. Yes, we still like to be liked, a
quality that betrays our naivete. On the same date, Coleridge is next recorded
as saying:
“The last
American war [which we know as the War of 1812] was to us only something to talk
or read about; but to the Americans it was the cause of misery in their own
homes.”
Coleridge’s
sympathy for the Americans, less than two decades after the most recent war,
during which some 15,000 Americans were killed and roughly 8,600 British, is
gratifying. Next, he moves from the specifics of geopolitics to a more general
assessment:
“I, for one,
do not call the sod under my feet my country. But language, religion, laws,
government, blood, — identity in these makes men of one country.”
I would like
to concur, but America is more than an idea. “Sod” gives us a place to call our
own and defend, and that proud impulse solidifies our identity as Americans.
Coleridge is stirringly correct: “language, religion, laws, government, blood”
unite us. Or they did at one time. Our selfishness has undermined our
Americaness. Later in Table Talk, on
April 10, 1833, Coleridge writes:
“The
possible destiny of the United States of America,—as a nation of a hundred
millions of freemen,—stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific, living under
the laws of Alfred, and speaking the language of Shakspeare and Milton, is an
august conception. Why should we not wish to see it realized? America would
then be England viewed through a solar microscope; Great Britain in a state of
glorious magnification! How deeply to be lamented is the spirit of hostility
and sneering which some of the popular books of travels have shown in treating
of the Americans! They hate us, no doubt, just as brothers hate; but they respect
the opinion of an Englishman concerning themselves ten times as much as that of
a native of any other country on earth. A very little humouring of their
prejudices, and some courtesy of language and demeanour on the part of
Englishmen, would work wonders, even as it is, with the public mind of the
Americans.”
No comments:
Post a Comment