I came upon rodomontade again, with a slightly
different spelling, in Hazlitt’s “On Familiar Style” (Table Talk, Essays on Men and Manners, 1822). He begins a paragraph
with “It is as easy to write a gaudy style without ideas as it is to spread a
pallet of showy colours or to smear in a flaunting transparency.” Hazlitt is
condemning empty verbiage, filigree as a stand-in for content. He continues, singling out
empty-headed theater critics: “Not a glimpse can you get of the merits or
defects of the performers: they are hidden in a profusion of barbarous epithets
and wilful rhodomontade.” Hazlitt’s target is not a rich, colorful prose style,
as in Sir Thomas Browne and Nabokov (and, at his best, Hazlitt), but writers
who substitute overwriting and verbal pyrotechnics for substance. Propose your
own florid candidate but I nominate the late William H. Gass.
Not that
lush prose is always a substitute for mature style. Nabokov has John Shade say
in Pale Fire: “First of all, dismiss
ideas, and social background, and train the freshman to shiver, to get drunk on
the poetry of Hamlet or Lear, to read with his spine and not
with his skull.” Kinbote asks: “You appreciate particularly the purple
passages?" Shade replies: “Yes, my dear Charles, I roll upon them as a
grateful mongrel on a spot of turf fouled by a Great Dane.”
No comments:
Post a Comment