“Respect for
the other man’s personality; the sense of the improbability of any rigid
doctrine being ‘right.’ The refusal to see the political world in simple black
& white.
“Pursuit of
the good that can be seen and grasped, not of the ‘highest good.’”
I’m probably
not the target audience for the English philosopher Michael Oakeshott
(1901-1990). I have little interest in politics. I tend to think of him first as
a writer, then as a thinker. His best-known essay, and certainly the most
influential in my reading, is “On Being Conservative,” in which he commonsensically
snubs politics in the conventional sense: “To be conservative, then, is to
prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to
mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to
the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the
perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss.” This makes sharp, intuitive sense.
One distrusts those who are ungrateful and pathologically discontented.
The passage quoted at the top is from Oakeshott’s Notebooks,
1922-86 (Imprint Academic, 2014). I thought of them and other things in
that book while rereading Henry James’ novel The Princess Casamassima (1886). Here he is on the evolving thought
of his protagonist Hyacinth Robinson:
“What was
supreme in his mind to-day was not the idea of how the society that surrounded
him should be destroyed; it was, much more, the sense of the wonderful,
precious things it had produced, of the brilliant, impressive fabric it had
raised. That destruction was waiting for it there was forcible evidence, known
to himself and others, to show; but since this truth had risen before him, in
its magnitude he had become conscious of a transfer, partial if not complete,
of his sympathies.”
No comments:
Post a Comment