“Political
satire at the expense of governments or institutions is one thing. Personal
invective is another. Swift was an expert at both. He himself did not take
kindly to being the butt of the wit or satire of others. Early in his close
friendship with Dr. Patrick Delany, Delany made some sally at Swift’s expense,
and laughed loudly at his own wit.”
As
Glendenning puts it, Delany was “reproved by Swift in verse.” In 1718, Swift
wrote “To Mr. Delany,” which includes these lines:
“If what you
said I wish unspoke,
Twill not
suffice it was a joke:
Reproach
not, though in jest, a friend
For those
defects he cannot mend;
His lineage,
calling, shape, or sense,
If nam’d
with scorn, gives just offence.”
According to Pat Rogers, editor of Swift's Complete Poems (1983), "To Mr. Delany" concerns the "rules of raillery" (Swift's phrase -- consider it in the context of Twitter), which he believed Thomas Sheridan, their mutual friend, had violated. An earlier couplet
is worth considering: “Talents for conversation fit / Are humour, breeding,
sense, and wit.” Doesn’t that remain true today? Swift distinguishes humor and
wit in traditional eighteenth-century fashion: “Our conversation to refine, / Humour
and wit must both combine.” Swift might be accused of hypocrisy when he
reprimands Sheridan for his satirical jabs. But Swift was big enough to remain his friend and wise enough to grudgingly admire his chutzpah:
“When jests
are carried on too far,
And the loud
laugh begins the war,
You keep
your countenance for shame,
Yet still
you think your friend to blame:
For, though
men cry they love a jest,
’Tis but
when others stand the test;
And (would
you have their meaning known)
They love a
jest that is their own.”
No comments:
Post a Comment