A favorite
is a hefty volume (1,012 pages) edited by the late John Gross, The New Oxford Book of English Prose
(1998). As a collection, it is nearly comprehensive and genuinely democratic,
in the sense that one suspects Gross had little use for some of the writers he includes
(James Purdy? Norman Mailer?). But his emphasis is on the quality of the prose.
Even lousy writers can be quoted sympathetically, if seldom. In his
introduction, Gross refers to his selections as “unashamedly literary” and
adds:
“A
well-argued legal judgment, a lucid scientific paper, a readily grasped set of
technical instructions all represent triumphs of prose after their fashion. And
quantity tells. Inspired prose may be as rare as great poetry—though I am
inclined to doubt even that; but good prose is unquestionably far more common
than good poetry. It is something you can come across every day: in a letter,
in a newspaper, almost anywhere.”
Gross
reminds us that writing (and reading) prose is more than merely utilitarian,
though that’s generally how it’s taught in school. Teachers treat composition (and
reading) as a punitive exercise, whereas the only way to write is enthusiastically,
with gusto and gratitude for the privilege.
Many of
Gross’ selections are inspired and not the customary anthology-fodder or "fine writing." For instance:
the interview with De Gaulle in The Road
Back to Paris (1944) by A.J. Liebling; the delicious scene of postwar
London described by Rose Macaulay in The
World My Wilderness (1947); T.S. Eliot on Tennyson; Nabokov’s description
of Timofey Pnin preparing a lecture; David Hume on Jacobean prose; Conrad’s
description of Pedrito Montero in Nostromo
(1904); Santayana’s digression on the fear of death in Three Philosophical Poets (1910); and the opening of the “Battle
Royal” chapter in Ralph Ellison’s Invisible
Man (1952):
“It goes a
long way back, some twenty years. All my life I had been looking for something,
and everywhere I turned someone tried to tell me what it was. I accepted their
answers too, though they were often in contradiction and even
self-contradictory. I was naive. I was looking for myself and asking everyone
except myself questions which I, and only I, could answer. It took me a long
time and much painful boomeranging of my expectations to achieve a realization
everyone else appears to have been born with: That I am nobody but myself. But
first I had to discover that I am an invisible man!”
Often, as
the result of absently dipping into Gross’ collection, I’ve been inspired to
return to an old favorite. Last week he moved me to reread Stephen Crane’s “The
Open Boat” (1897), which I haven’t read in forty years or more.
1 comment:
Speaking of Pnin, I recently re-read it for the explicit purpose of finding this sentence, which has stayed with me since first read.
"Doffing his spectacles, [Pnin] rubbed with the knuckles of the hand that held them his naked and tired eyes and, still in thought, fixed his mild gaze on the window above, where, gradually, through his dissolving meditation, there appeared the violet-blue air of dusk, silver-tooled by the reflection of the fluorescent lights of the ceiling, and, among spidery black twigs, a mirrored row of bright book spines".
By the time I encountered it (page 78 of my edition), I was in too deep to wade out. Nabokov amazes and delights every time.
Post a Comment