Like most citizens,
I’m largely indifferent to the names of the streets paved and maintained with our
tax money, though some names reek of ego or bad poetry. My son’s friend lives on
Jim West Street. The parallel streets to the north are Betty and Lula; to the
south, Wendell, Verone and Mildred. Some contractor’s family is immortalized in
signage and on maps.
Our house, built
in 1962, is on the second of four parallel cul-de-sacs named “courts.” Ours is Moss
Hollow Court (wrong on all three counts) and the others are Leafy Hollow, Shady
Nook and Hollow Bend – someone’s notion of pastoral urban living. But as Max
Beerbohm reminds us in “The Naming of Streets” (Yet Again, 1909):
“[A] name
cannot (in the long-run) make any shadow of difference in our sentiment for the
street that bears it, for our sentiment is solely according to the character of
the street itself; and, further, a street does nothing at all to keep green the
memory of one whose name is given to it.”
For once, I quibble
some with Beerbohm. While driving west on Bissonnet and crossing Auden, I thought of the poet and not of billboards and motorcycles. Something similar
occurred on Goldsmith Street. Here I agree with Beerbohm and not with his
friend:
“And I doubt
not that for him, as for me, the mere sound or sight of a street's name
conjures up the sensation he feels when he passes through that street. For him,
probably, the name of every street has hitherto seemed to be also its exact,
inevitable symbol, a perfect suggestion of its character. He has believed that
the grand or beautiful streets have grand or beautiful names, the mean or ugly
streets mean or ugly names. Let me assure him that this is a delusion. The name
of a street, as of a human being, derives its whole quality from its bearer.”
In fact,
Lanier Street is quite attractive.
1 comment:
I second your quibble with Beerbohm's “[A] name cannot (in the long-run) make any shadow of difference in our sentiment for the street that bears it ...".
For years, I lived on Addison Drive in Reynoldsburg Ohio, before it finally dawned on me that the development's street names had literary/scholarly associations. I still savor this, and pointed it out to the local historical society.
Addison Drive: Joseph 18th c essayist/poet (Samuel Johnson: “Whoever wishes to attain an English style, familiar but not coarse, and elegant but not ostentatious, must give his days and nights to the volumes of Addison.")
Priestly Drive: Joseph, 18th c theologian
Dickens: Charles 18th c novelist
Kingsley: Charles 18th c novelist
Jonson: Ben 17th c playwright
Bunyan: John 17th c writer (Pilgrim's Progress)
Carlyle: Thomas 19th c writer (Scottish)
Fletcher: John 18th c theologian
Eliot: T.S., 20th c poet (or John, 17th c missionary)
Goldsmith: Oliver 18th c novelist, poet (Irish)
Hilton: James 20th c novelist (Lost Horizon)
Ruskin: John 19th c art critic
Noyes: Alfred 20th c poet
Shaw: George Bernard 19/20th c playwright, novelist (Irish)
Maugham: W. Somerset 20th c novelist
Post a Comment