On Friday a
friend sent me a photograph of two plastic pink flamingos standing on their
steel legs on the lawn in front of someone’s house. At this point, we are expected
to snort at the philistinism, the unapologetic vulgarity of such a display, except
that both flamingos wear white surgical masks over their bills. I told my
friend I think of such gestures as a form of folk poetry. On the one hand, it’s
simple silliness; on the other, an implied thumbing of the nose at
public-health pieties. On this date, March 21, in 1908, G.K. Chesterton
published “Popular Jokes and Vulgarity” in the London Illustrated News:
“I believe
firmly in the value of all vulgar notions, especially of vulgar jokes. When
once you have got hold of a vulgar joke, you may be certain that you have got
hold of a subtle and spiritual idea. The men who made the joke saw something
deep which they could not express except by something silly and emphatic.”
Erudite wit
and a finely calibrated sense of irony are to be prized but don’t overlook the
genius of what Tom Wolfe celebrates as “this wild, bizarre, unpredictable,
hog-stomping, Baroque country of ours.” Humor mutates with every humorist. It’s
no stretch for one man or woman to uncontrollably laugh with Alexander Pope and
W.C. Fields. It’s useful to remember (as Chesterton surely did) that vulgarity
is rooted in the Latin vulgāritas, meaning the masses or multitude or, more
disapprovingly, the mob. Chesterton goes on to distinguish himself somewhat
from the wittiest of all writers, Max Beerbohm, by referring to the latter’s essay
“The Humour of the Public”:
“In order to
understand vulgar humour it is not enough to be humourous; one must also be
vulgar, as I am.”
No comments:
Post a Comment