Encountering
scold as a noun brings to mind The Good Influence, one of nine
illustrations Grant Wood made in 1936 for a Limited Editions Club reprint of
Sinclair Lewis’ Main Street (1920). The drawing depicts Mrs. Bogart,
described by Guy Davenport as a “moralist, prude, and bully.” His essay, “Grant
Wood’s The Good Influence,” is included in The Hunter Gracchus and
Other Papers on Literature and Art (1996). Davenport gives a scholarly
account of the influences on Wood’s drawing and writes:
“Once we
have the iconographic information that this all too typical Midwestern American
woman is a specific character in a satirical novel (she is a widow and has
spoiled her son, who is a lout), we see her for what she is: a gossip, a
hypocrite, a self-righteous critic of other people.”
The most precious
of American rights is the right to be left alone. Who needs some nagging Mrs.
Bogart critiquing his behavior, thoughts and speech? I confess to formerly
thinking of scolds as people of Mrs. Bogart’s general age and appearance – school-marmish
and disapproving are the adjectives that come to mind. Yet most of the scolds I
see on the news are young people – already moralists, prudes and bullies, to
use Davenport’s words. Busybodyism, of course, is no respecter of age, sex,
race, religion or ethnicity. It’s an equal-opportunity pain in the ass.
Marianne Moore puts it like this in her poem “Snakes, Mongooses.Snake-Charmers, and the Like,” first published less than two years after Main Street:
“The passion
for setting people right is in itself an afflictive disease.
Distaste
which takes no credit to itself is best.”
No comments:
Post a Comment