Joseph Epstein proposes a useful new category of books: “those one is pleased never to have read.” Before you get high and mighty, think about it: Aren’t you glad -- limiting nominees exclusively to Nobel Prize recipients – not to have devoted precious hours to reading José Echegaray y Eizaguirre, Elfriede Jelinek and Dario Fo? That’s what I thought.
Epstein begins his
personal gratitude list with John Barth’s The Sot-Weed Factor and Giles
Goat Boy, tumid tomes I endured when still young and strong. He goes on to suggest
appropriately unread titles by Mailer, Roth, Updike and Pynchon, as well as Plath’s
unreadable The Bell Jar and “the next four novels of Salman Rushdie.”
We think of peer-pressure
as a phenomenon of the teenage years. But wouldn’t you agree that publishing
and much vogueish literary criticism and canon-building depends on it? No one
would have voluntarily read An American Dream or Why Are We in
Vietnam? unless urged to do so by critics of dubious judgment and their own
desire to appear sophisticated or with-it. I include my younger self in that
category. Vanity drives much of the literary world, both readers and writers.
Let’s not limit our happily
unread list to the recent and contemporary. The present, after all, is a small,
provincial place. I have never read anything by a Brontë, Wilkie Collins or
Jack London. Nor have I read a series urged on me recently by a reader, The
Chronicles of Narnia. As one matures, entire genres become unread and often
unreadable – most notably, fantasy and science fiction. We become jealous of
our time and don’t wish to squander it on fashionable trash. Epstein
continues:
“This could be followed by
an accompanying list of books one regrets having read. Many of the same authors
would of course appear on both lists.”
That list is vast and,
blessedly, some of it has been forgotten. Virginia Woolf, Kurt Vonnegut,
Melville’s Pierre, Hemingway, Graham Greene, Günter Grass,
Alain Robbe-Grillet, Charles Olson, Finnegans Wake. So much wasted time
and effort.
[You’ll find Epstein’s
proposal in Where Were We? (St. Augustine’s Press, 2017), his second
collection of email exchanges with Frederic Raphael, on page 259.]
2 comments:
Recommending books to read, or not, requires intimately knowing the taste of another reader; otherwise, it's a minefield. The best thing, to my mind, is to share one's own experience and let the other person take it from there. That is one of the reasons I enjoy this blog. It has provided me with many happy reading moments and links to writers I may never have otherwise encountered.
I read my first Wilkie Collins - The Woman in White - a couple of years ago. If that's squandering time, may I continue to squander it.
Post a Comment