We are probably better buffered than most Americans against advertising. We have no cable-television connection. Our spam filter does its job, and any online site that throws up an advertising obstacle course we generally skip. We subscribe to few magazines and no newspapers, and I listen to CDs in the car, almost never the radio. When people start recounting the commercial they found so amusing last night, I’m gone. It’s reassuring to know there’s nothing new about such sentiments. Consider Joseph Addison’s essay in The Tatler on September 14, 1710:
“I cannot excuse my fellow-labourers
for admitting into their papers several uncleanly advertisements, not at all
proper to appear in the works of polite writers. Among these I must reckon the Carminitive Wind-expelling pills. If the doctor had
called them his carminitive pills, he had done as cleanly as any one could have
wished; but the second word entirely destroys the decency of the first. There
are other absurdities of this nature so very gross, that I dare not mention
them.”
Imagine what Addison would
make of advertisements for pills, liquids and creams that treat hemorrhoids, erectile
dysfunction, diarrhea and constipation, not to mention condoms and feminine
hygiene products. Of course, Addison was a pragmatic editor and publisher. He
understood that periodicals relied on advertising for their ongoing existence. He
specifically cites “collections of advertisements that appear at the end of all
our public prints.” This brings to mind an interesting, seemingly contradictory
phenomenon: the sense of nostalgia induced by the advertising of the past. Only
when no longer current is advertising of interest. Years ago a friend gave me the
issues of Life magazine that bracket the date of my birth in 1952. On the
back of the November 3 issue is an ad for Camel cigarettes: “Why did you change
to Camels, Farley Granger?” And Farley answers: “I tried Camels as my steady
smoke for 30 days—they beat any other cigarette I’ve smoked!”
Back to “Carminitive
Wind-expelling pills.” From the context, you’ve probably figured out the
meaning of the first adjective: “Of medicines, etc.: Having the quality of
expelling flatulence.” One wonders what the OED is refering to with that
all-inclusive “etc.”
No comments:
Post a Comment