“We owe our gratitude to the men of letters who deliberately undertake to be gay: for nobody expects unconscious and spontaneous gayety in books nowadays. The modern spirit has seen to that.”
An obnoxiously necessary
clarification: gay in this context does not mean homosexual. Rather: “light-hearted,
carefree; manifesting, characterized by, or disposed to joy and mirth;
exuberantly cheerful, merry; sportive [OED].” Let’s get to what Louise
Imogen Guiney (1861-1920) has to say in her sportive little essay “Wilful Sadness in Literature” (Patrins, 1892). She begins by applauding Matthew Arnold’s
decision to leave “Empedocles on Etna” out of his collected poems because he
deemed it “too mournful, too introspective, too unfruitful of the cheer and
courage which it is the business of poets to give to the world.” Guiney
endorses what she calls “the helping word” and dismisses “whatever is uselessly
doleful, and spread abroad the right idea of what is fit to be uttered in this
valley of tears.”
Your average adolescent
knows the world is a terrible place where the innocent are defiled, the guilty
flourish and justice is seldom served. It takes an adult to appreciate a good
joke, perform a gratuitous kindness and see enduring beauty in a muddled world.
“The play which leaves us
miserable and bewildered,” Guiney writes, “the harrowing social lesson leading
nowhere, the transcript from commonplace life in which nothing is admirable but
the faithful skill of the author— these are bad morals because they are bad
art.” By “wilful sadness,” Guiney means something like self-pity. “It is
inconvenient,” she writes, “to have the large old fundamental feelings: to be
energetic, or scornful, or believing. The fashionable poetic utterance is
dejected, and of consummate refinement . . .”
Let’s return to gay. Guiney might concur with Yeats in “Lapis Lazuli”: “They know that Hamlet and Lear are gay; / Gaiety transfiguring all that dread.” She concludes her essay with these words: “Change is at hand. The Maypole is up in Bookland.” She couldn’t know what the twentieth century was to hold.
1 comment:
Thank you for this introduction to Guiney -- I'd not heard of her before -- and her essay. Timely topic! But then willful sadness in lit is a perennial (if not constant) ailing.
I looked her up: the ClevePubLib has only a non-lending copy of Patrins, so the Proj. Gut. link is a relief. The chapter headings promise well: "On the rabid versus the harmless scholar," "On the delights of an incognito," "On a pleasing encounter with a pickpocket," etc. Very thank you.
Post a Comment