“He was the very model of a grand old man: punctilious, unbellicose, evenhanded, coasting with evident enjoyment down the waning rim of his life and into—well, posterity?”
A graduate student in
English, soon to write one of the first books devoted to the now forgotten
novelist John Gardner, came downstairs, probably on September 30, 1973, to tell
me W.H. Auden had died at age sixty-six. He had tears on his face. I had
thought of Auden for some time as old yet somehow permanent, like Proust. In
the previous year or so we had lost Marianne Moore, John Berryman, Edmund
Wilson. As a kid, I discovered Auden’s poems in an Oscar Williams anthology. Here’s
an admission that at one time would have embarrassed me: I liked his poems
because I understood them. He wrote to be understood and to please his reader,
not to sound brooding or baffling. Among his chief virtues as a writer were
articulation and clarity. You came to think he could write a poem about
anything, however unlikely, and make it work.
Over the holidays I’ve
kept his hefty Collected Poems on my nightstand, reading a few at random
each day, starting with my current favorite, “In Praise of Limestone.” It’s
fashionable to see a decline in quality in Auden’s work in his final years.
I don’t see it. Take “Old People’s Home,” written in 1970 for his friend Elizabeth
Mayer and collected in Epistle for a Godson (1972). It begins:
“All are limitory, but
each has her own
nuance of damage. The elite can dress and decent themselves,
are ambulant with a single stick, adroit
to read a book all
through, or play the slow movements of
easy sonatas. (Yet, perhaps their very
carnal freedom is their
spirit's bane: intelligent
of what has happened and why, they are
obnoxious
to a glum beyond tears.)”
A fiction writer might envy the human wealth in these lines, clear and suggestive as good prose. The
passage quoted at the top is from the remembrance L.E. Sissman wrote for Auden,
published in The Atlantic Monthly and collected in Innocent
Bystander: The Scene from the 70’s (1975). Sissman concludes:
“So I have written instead
this fragment of reminiscence of how his work affected me when I first came
upon him, and how it has affected me for the rest of my adult life. Because he has
lived, in his enduring influence on myself and others, it is safe to say he will
live. Of that I am quite sure.”
Sissman himself, born on
January 1, 1928, would die two and a half years after Auden, on March 10, 1976,
at age forty-eight.
1 comment:
I do wonder just what it means for a writer to be "forgotten." No one teaches their books? That's probably a benefit rather than otherwise. I read John Gardner's Grendel a while back and thought it was wonderful. This year I gave as Christmas gifts copies of A High Wind in Jamaica by Richard Hughes and From Here to Eternity by James Jones, both probably "forgotten" - but who cares? Both books have moved me and given me pleasure, enough that I wanted to pass them on to those whom I thought were capable of appreciating them. Can any writer hope for more?
Post a Comment