“Would you anathemize, banish, imprison, execute us, and burn our books?”
Of course they would,
given half a chance. Pettiness, insecurity and hunger for power are a steady
state in human affairs, even when merely latent. The cause du jour, whether
communism, fascism or religious zealotry, is just an excuse. Our species is reliably
savage. The passage above is from Andrew Marvell’s “A Short Historical Essay Touching General Councils, Creeds, and Impositions in Matters of Religion.” It’s
not among his major works, which are his poems, but a reminder that moral
progress is a myth and that 2021 could soon turn as barbarous as the English seventeenth
century with its civil war and regicide.
The poet’s survival during
this bloody period recalls Montaigne’s during the previous century’s religious
wars in France. Marvell was a master of ambiguity and nuance, navigating the political
and religious treacheries of his day. Take his poem “An Horatian Ode upon Cromwell’s Return from Ireland” (1650). Is it pro-Cromwell or anti-Cromwell?
Read superficially, the former seems the case. But Marvell is moved by the fate
of Charles I:
“He nothing common
did or mean
Upon that memorable Scene:
But with his keener Eye
The Axes edge did try:
Nor call’d the Gods with
vulgar spight
To vindicate his helpless
Right,
But bow’d his comely Head,
Down as upon a Bed.”
Among Marvell’s strongest
modern admirers is C.H. Sisson, who calls the “Horatian Ode” the “greatest
political poem in the language.” In the introduction to his 1980 translation of
The Divine Comedy (Carcanet, 1980), Sisson writes:
“. . . all literary
encounters have a certain unceremoniousness about them. We surround ourselves
with books so that we can call up Montaigne, or Eckermann, or Virgil, or Andrew
Marvell, as the mood takes us or the drift of our interests at the time
suggests. There are scores or hundreds of merely casual encounters, and some of
more intimate significance. The latter have their times, and their place in
one’s development as a reader or a writer.”
Marvell was born four hundred
years ago today, on March 31, 1621. He died in 1678 at age fifty-seven.
No comments:
Post a Comment