Auberon Waugh (1939-2001) seems to have barely survived the voyage across the Atlantic. Even his surname (he was the eldest son of Evelyn) didn’t help. Perhaps because he was best known in England as a journalist, and journalism is eminently perishable and doesn’t travel well, awareness among American readers is minimal. I’ve read A Scribbler in Soho: A Celebration of Auberon Waugh (2019) and his autobiography, Will This Do? (1991), and I’ve always been touched by the simple, true verdict he passed on his father after the novelist’s death in 1966: “[H]e was the funniest man of his generation.” Now that’s filial piety.
In 1972, “Bron” Waugh published
his fifth and final novel, A Bed of Flowers. Nige has read it and on Saturday wrote: “It is Shakespeare's pastoral comedy reimagined as a hippie
idyll, in all its sweetness and absurdity.” After half a century it’s about
time I read it too. The novel is long out of print but I’ve put the library’s copy
on hold. As Nige says, it’s unlikely a new edition will be published, “especially
in these woke times.”
Nige’s post moved me to
look around online and see what is available. In the September 1987 issue of Chronicles
he published “Doggerel in a Good Cause’:
“As editor of the Literary
Review, I am afraid I have formed rather a low opinion of the nation's poets. Every
week 20 or 30 offerings arrive through the post, and I often glance at them
before handing them over to the magazine's saintly, long-suffering poetry editor.
With amazingly few exceptions, these ‘poems’ are prosaic, confused, derivative,
usually hard to follow, and often quite unambiguously meaningless. The general atmosphere
is one of gloom, which would not matter if there were any compensating
originality of perception or joy in the use of words. But the prevailing spirit
of dullness and selfabsorption produces no emotion stronger than boredom.”
Sounds familiar. The
dreariness Waugh detects has only grown drearier in the last thirty-five years,
as has the linkage between safely bien pensant sentiments and the wish to express them
in prose camouflaged as poetry. Waugh perceives the “vague equation of
obscurity with cleverness, of self-absorption with art, of triviality with
elegance,” and continues:
“The modern poet for a long time accepted that few people would want to read him and saw this as a tribute to his own superiority. Now, in the post-Modernist age, he would dearly like to be read but has lost the skill to please.”
I read Auberon Waugh's "Consider the Lillies" and would gladly read more by him. From "Consider the Lillies" I got the impression that A. Waugh was a kind of British Peter DeVries - only dark, cynical and with a wide streak of that nastiness we associate with British journalism. I think it was the nastiness that kept him from becoming popular in the United States.
ReplyDelete