“Like meter, rhyme seems to appeal to a basic human capacity for play and fun. Just as people enjoy and respond to rhythmical patterns, so they delight in verbal correspondences . . .”
As evidence to
bolster Timothy Steele’s observation, I cite not Yeats, Cunningham
or Larkin but these lines, memorized through repetition fifty-seven years ago:
“Well, she
don’t make me nervous
She don’t
talk too much
She walks
like Bo Diddley
And she don’t
need no crutch”
And these,
from a decade later, including the Longfellow allusion that had already been committed
to memory:
“The legend
lives on from the Chippewa on down
Of the big
lake they called Gitche Gumee
The lake, it
is said, never gives up her dead
When the
skies of November turn gloomy”
Meter and
rhyme abet memorability, regardless of the quality of the verse, and
memorability is a traditional gauge of reader pleasure and a poem’s worth. Memorizing
free verse at significant length is more difficult and usually less rewarding.
Presumably, there are readers who carry around anthologies of the Roberts --
Bly and Creeley -- in their heads. My data-storage capacity is limited. Steele
continues:
“[R]hyme entails,
as does meter, both predictability and surprise. . . . reading a rhymed poem,
we can foresee that a word or syllable at the end of one line will be answered
by a word or syllable at the end of another, but we can’t usually or always
tell what the answering word or syllable will be or what significance the
correspondence will produce.”
In 1997,
Steele edited The Poems of J.V.
Cunningham (Swallow Press/Ohio University Press). Cunningham was a master
of rhyme. As a practitioner of the plain style, he wasn’t afraid to use conventional,
monosyllabic rhymes, as in this epigram from the late nineteen-forties:
“Life flows
to death as rivers to the sea,
And life is
fresh and death is salt to me.”
Reading
Cunningham closely again, I’ve noted that some of his most interesting rhymes
are found in his first stanzas, as though they served to “jump-start” his
poems. That’s pure speculation. Here is “Montana Pastoral,” from 1941:
“I am no
shepherd of a child’s surmises.
I have seen
fear where the coiled serpent rises,
“Thirst
where the grasses burn in early May
And thistle,
mustard, and the wild oat stay.
“There is
dust in this air. I saw in the heat
Grasshoppers
busy in the threshing wheat.
“So to this
hour. Through the warm dusk I drove
To blizzards
sifting on the hissing stove,
“And found
no images of pastoral will,
But fear,
thirst, hunger, and this huddled chill.”
The best
rhymes, plain or fancy, seem to combine unexpectedness with inevitability. They
have a rightness about them. They seem to spark an adventuresome spirit in good
poets -- and dullness in drones. Boswell reports this exchange with Johnson on
July 9, 1763:
“He enlarged
very convincingly upon the excellence of rhyme over blank verse [not free verse] in English poetry. I
mentioned to him that Dr. Adam Smith, in his lectures upon composition, when I
studied under him in the College of Glasgow, had maintained the same opinion
strenuously, and I repeated some of his arguments. JOHNSON: ‘Sir, I was once in
company with Smith, and we did not take to each other; but had I known that he
loved rhyme as much as you tell me he does, I should have HUGGED him.’”
Johnson was
no gratuitous hugger. Here is the definition of rhyme in his Dictionary: “the consonance of verses;
the correspondence of the last sound of one verse to the last sound or syllable
of another.”
1 comment:
Thanks, Patrick, the notion that we more easily recall rhyme than free verse certainly resonates with me. When I think of "The Wasteland" I can immediately recall very little with accuracy except, "I will show you fear in a handful of dust" because the imagery is so vivid. On the other had, I can recite all of Auden's "As I Walked Out One Evening" from memory because of the rhythm and rhyme.
Post a Comment